Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102998›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Development of a clinical pharmacy model within an Australian home nursing service using co-creation and participatory action research: the

Rohan A Elliott, Cik Yin Lee, Christine Beanland, Dianne P Goeman, Neil Petrie, Barbara Petrie, Felicity Vise, June Gray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rohan A ElliottBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-9724
Cik Yin LeeBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
Christine BeanlandBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
Dianne P GoemanBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
Neil PetriePRN Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Barbara PetriePRN Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Felicity ViseBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
June GrayBolton Clarke (formerly Royal District Nursing Service), St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
Austin Health · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a collaborative, person-centred model of clinical pharmacy support for community nurses and their medication management clients.

designCo-creation and participatory action research, based on reflection, data collection, interaction and feedback from participants and other stakeholders.

settingA large, non-profit home nursing service in Melbourne, Australia.

participantsOlder people referred to the home nursing service for medication management, their carers, community nurses, general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists, a multidisciplinary stakeholder reference group (including consumer representation) and the project team. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Feedback and reflections from minutes, notes and transcripts from: project team meetings, clinical pharmacists' reflective diaries and interviews, meetings with community nurses, reference group meetings and interviews and focus groups with 27 older people, 18 carers, 53 nurses, 15 GPs and seven community pharmacists.

resultsThe model was based on best practice medication management standards and designed to address key medication management issues raised by stakeholders. Pharmacist roles included direct client care and indirect care. Direct care included home visits, medication reconciliation, medication review, medication regimen simplification, preparation of medication lists for clients and nurses, liaison and information sharing with prescribers and pharmacies and patient/carer education. Indirect care included providing medicines information and education for nurses and assisting with review and implementation of organisational medication policies and procedures. The model allowed nurses to refer directly to the pharmacist, enabling timely resolution of medication issues. Direct care was provided to 84 older people over a 15-month implementation period. Ongoing feedback and consultation, in line with participatory action research principles, informed the development and refinement of the model and identification of enablers and challenges.

conclusionsA collaborative, person-centred clinical pharmacy model that addressed the needs of clients, carers, nurses and other stakeholders was successfully developed. The model is likely to have applicability to home nursing services nationally and internationally.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchModels, OrganizationalAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFocus GroupsHealth EducationHome NursingHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPharmacy Service, Hospitalclinical pharmacyco-creation and participatory action researchhome nursing or home caremedication managementmedication reviewolder people

Identifiers

PMID29102998
PMCPMC5722093
OpenAlexW2765931886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.