Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102997›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

'Just a GP': a mixed method study of undermining of general practice as a career choice in the UK.

Hugh Alberti, Kimberley Banner, Helen Collingwood, Kymberlee Merritt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of role modelling on the future general practitioner workforce: a systematic review.Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Crossing the Rubicon: assisted dying in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radical solutions are needed to meet the challenge of medical student placement capacity in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Responsive policies needed to secure rural supply from increasing female doctors: A perspective.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugh AlbertiNewcastle School of Medical Education, The Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Kimberley BannerDurham Tees Valley GP training Programme, Health Education North East Lead Employer Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-3419
Helen CollingwoodDurham Tees Valley GP training Programme, Health Education North East Lead Employer Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kymberlee MerrittDurham Tees Valley GP training Programme, Health Education North East Lead Employer Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Education Trust · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFailure to recruit sufficient applicants to general practice (GP) training has been a problem both nationally and internationally for many years and undermining of GP is one possible contributing factor. The aim of our study was to ascertain what comments, both negative and positive, are being made in UK clinical settings to GP trainees about GP and to further explore these comments and their influence on career choice. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a mixed methods study. We surveyed all foundation doctors and GP trainees within one region of Health Education England regarding any comments they experienced relating to a career in GP. We also conducted six focus groups with early GP trainees to discuss any comments that they experienced and whether these comments had any influence on their or others career choice.

resultsPositive comments reported by trainees centred around the concept that choosing GP is a positive, family-focused choice which facilities a good work-life balance. Workload was the most common negative comment, alongside the notion of being 'just a GP'; the belief that GP is boring, a waste of training and a second-class career choice. The reasons for and origin of the comments are multifactorial in nature. Thematic analysis of the focus groups identified key factors such as previous exposure to and experience of GP, family members who were GPs, GP role models, demographics of the clinician and referral behaviour. Trainees perceived that negative comments may be discouraging others from choosing GP as a career.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that negative comments towards GP as a career do exist within clinical settings and are having a potential impact on poor recruitment rates to GP training. We have identified areas in which further negative comments could be prevented by changing perceptions of GP as a career. Additional time spent in GP as undergraduates and postgraduates, and positive GP role models, could particularly benefit recruitment. We recommend that undermining of GP as a career choice be approached with a zero-tolerance policy.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceJob SatisfactionFocus GroupsGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWorkloadprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID29102997
PMCPMC5722080
OpenAlexW2766284473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.