Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102990›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol.

Sara Farnbach, John Evans, Anne-Marie Eades, Graham Gee, Jamie Fernando, Belinda Hammond, Matty Simms, Karrina DeMasi, Maree Hackett

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara FarnbachThe George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
John EvansThe University of Technology and The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne-Marie EadesThe George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Graham GeeVictorian Aboriginal Health Service, Victoria, Australia.
Jamie FernandoThe University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda HammondNunkuwarrin Yunti of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.
Matty SimmsThe Glen Centre (Ngampie), New South Wales, Australia.
Karrina DeMasiDanila Dilba Health Service, Northern Territory, Australia.
Maree HackettThe George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUVictorian Aboriginal Health Service · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcess evaluations are conducted alongside research projects to identify the context, impact and consequences of research, determine whether it was conducted per protocol and to understand how, why and for whom an intervention is effective. We present a process evaluation protocol for the Getting it Right research project, which aims to determine validity of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In this process evaluation, we aim to: (1) explore the context, impact and consequences of conducting Getting It Right, (2) explore primary healthcare staff and community representatives' experiences with the research project, (3) determine if it was conducted per protocol and (4) explore experiences with the depression screening tool, including perceptions about how it could be implemented into practice (if found to be valid). We also describe the partnerships established to conduct this process evaluation and how the national METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist and grounded theory approaches are used. Qualitative data include semistructured interviews with primary healthcare staff and community representatives involved with Getting it Right. Iterative data collection and analysis will inform a coding framework. Interviews will continue until saturation of themes is reached, or all participants are considered. Data will be triangulated against administrative data and patient feedback. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group guides this research. Researchers will be blinded from validation data outcomes for as long as is feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales and six state ethics committees have approved this research. Findings will be submitted to academic journals and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000705684.

Indexed as

Culturally Competent CareAustraliaDepressionFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMaleMass ScreeningPrimary Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch Designmental healthprimary carepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29102990
PMCPMC5722089
OpenAlexW2766438883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.