Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102944›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Cancer Patients' Knowledge and Acceptance of Physical Activities for Rehabilitation.

Jens Büntzel, Irene Kusterer, Yvonne Rudolph, Thomas Kubin, Oliver Micke, Jutta Hübner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jens BüntzelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Südharz Hospital, Nordhausen, Germany jens.buentzel@shk-ndh.de.
Irene KustererOnkologische Ambulanz, Medius-Kliniken GmbH, Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany.
Yvonne RudolphDeutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KubinDepartment of Hematooncology, Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Germany.
Oliver MickeDepartment of Radiooncology, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jutta HübnerDepartment of Hematology, Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany On Behalf of Working Group Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimPhysical activities are an essential part of patients' rehabilitation in oncology. For cancer patients special sport groups for rehabilitation exist and are reimbursed by the statutory health system. The aim of our study was to evaluate patients' knowledge and acceptance of these offers and their actual sportive engagement. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used a standardized questionnaire which was distributed in medical oncology and ENT oncology practice.

resultsFrom 200 questionnaires, we got 155 (76%) answers (83 females, 71 males, mean age was 64.8±12.0 years. A total of 80 patients had current cancer therapy. Sportive activity was decreasing from 71% before cancer, to 50% during therapy, to 40% after anticancer treatment. Only 24% of participants were informed about local offers for cancer patients. The 38% of our patients would like to become more active. Gender, former sportive experience, favourite disciplines, and the type of cancer are factors with a high impact on patient's affinity to physical exercise.

conclusionThe presented screening tool offers first and fast information about the patient's affinity to sports and helps the oncologist to offer patients individualized training concepts.

Indexed as

ExerciseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatientsSportsSurveys and Questionnairescancerphysical activityscreeningSports

Identifiers

PMID29102944
PMCPMC5756650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.