Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102670›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2018

And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

G Taccola, D Sayenko, P Gad, Y Gerasimenko, V R Edgerton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06444672 (Effects of a Home-Based Rehabilitation on Anthropometric Measures, Sensory-Motor Functions and Independence After Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06444672 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Home-Based Rehabilitation on Anthropometric Measures, Sensory-Motor Functions and Independence After Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MosulRan2021 to 2022Enrolled6ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury at T7-T10 Level, War Injuries Due to Bullets and Fragments, Spinal Cord Injury L1- L5, Spinal Cord Injury No Sensory/Motor in S4-S5ArmsHome-based Rehabilitation program, Knee-Ankle-Foot-Orthosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

G TaccolaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; Neuroscience Department, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Bonomea 265, Trieste, Italy.
D SayenkoDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
P GadDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
Y GerasimenkoDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; Pavlov Institute of Physiology, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
V R EdgertonDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; The Centre for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007 NSW, Australia; Institut Guttmann, Hospital de Neurorehabilitació, Institut Universitari adscrit a la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08916 Badalona, Spain. Electronic address: vre@ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Spinal Epidural Electrode Array to Facilitate Standing and Stepping After SCIR01EB007615 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EDGERTON, REGGIE · 2008 to 2013
$4.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical and clinical neurophysiological and neurorehabilitation research has generated rather surprising levels of recovery of volitional sensory-motor function in persons with chronic motor paralysis following a spinal cord injury. The key factor in this recovery is largely activity-dependent plasticity of spinal and supraspinal networks. This key factor can be triggered by neuromodulation of these networks with electrical and pharmacological interventions. This review addresses some of the systems-level physiological mechanisms that might explain the effects of electrical modulation and how repetitive training facilitates the recovery of volitional motor control. In particular, we substantiate the hypotheses that: (1) in the majority of spinal lesions, a critical number and type of neurons in the region of the injury survive, but cannot conduct action potentials, and thus are electrically non-responsive; (2) these neuronal networks within the lesioned area can be neuromodulated to a transformed state of electrical competency; (3) these two factors enable the potential for extensive activity-dependent reorganization of neuronal networks in the spinal cord and brain, and (4) propriospinal networks play a critical role in driving this activity-dependent reorganization after injury. Real-time proprioceptive input to spinal networks provides the template for reorganization of spinal networks that play a leading role in the level of coordination of motor pools required to perform a given functional task. Repetitive exposure of multi-segmental sensory-motor networks to the dynamics of task-specific sensory input as occurs with repetitive training can functionally reshape spinal and supraspinal connectivity thus re-enabling one to perform complex motor tasks, even years post injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMotor ActivityRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesVolitionElectrical stimulationMotor trainingNeuromodulationSpinal networks

Identifiers

PMID29102670
PMCPMC5773077
OpenAlexW2765484091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.