Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102443›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2018

Is it my turn to speak? An analysis of the dialogue in the family-physician intensive care unit conference.

Tessie W October, Zoelle B Dizon, Debra L Roter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tessie W OctoberDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: toctober@childrensnational.org.
Zoelle B DizonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: zdizon2@childrensnational.org.
Debra L RoterDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: droter@jhsph.edu.
Children's National · USGeorge Washington University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Pediatric Critical Care Scientist Development ProgramK12HD047349 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HEATHER T. KEENAN, Kevin M Watt · 2004 to 2026
$17.0M
Enhancing Parent-Provider Communication during Critical Care Decision-makingK23HD080902 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OCTOBER, TESSIE W. · 2015 to 2018
$558k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD047349NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD080902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveApply turn analysis to family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit.

methodsWe analyzed 39 audio-recorded family conferences using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. A turn was defined as a continuous block of uninterrupted statements by a speaker.

resultsOpening turns by the healthcare team (HCT) averaged 207s, compared to 28s for families. Turn density (number of statements/turn) was 6 for the HCT versus 2 for families (p<0.0001). An average of 21 turns (26%) occurred between HCT members, resulting in substantial sections of dialogue excluding the family. Average HCT dialogue reflected a literacy demand of a 9th grade level, whereas family dialogue averaged a 5th grade level (p<0.0001). More HCT turns were related to higher reading level demand (r=0.34; p=0.03) and lower levels of patient-centeredness (r=-0.35, p=0.03).

conclusionThe healthcare team can improve the communication experience for families by encouraging and facilitating family engagement in conference dialogue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Changing how the healthcare team engages with families during communication events is vital to improving the experience for families. Our data suggests simple adjustments, such as limiting medical jargon and inter-team turns may lead to increased family participation and more family-centered care.

Indexed as

CommunicationIntensive Care UnitsPatient Care TeamPhysicians, FamilyProfessional-Family RelationsAdultChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedChildDecision makingHealth communicationIntensive carePhysician-patient relationshipShared

Identifiers

PMID29102443
PMCPMC5878988
OpenAlexW2766256931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.