Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29102398›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Side effects of intraoral devices for OSAS treatment.

Andressa Otranto de Britto Teixeira, Ana Luiza Ladeia Andrade, Rhita Cristina da Cunha Almeida, Marco Antonio de Oliveira Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dentoskeletal changes of long-term oral appliance treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review of Etiology of Posterior Open Bite: Is There a Possible Genetic Cause?Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andressa Otranto de Britto TeixeiraUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Uerj), Faculdade de Odontologia, Ortodontia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: andressaotranto@terra.com.br.
Ana Luiza Ladeia AndradeUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Uerj), Faculdade de Odontologia, Ortodontia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rhita Cristina da Cunha AlmeidaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Uerj), Faculdade de Odontologia, Ortodontia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marco Antonio de Oliveira AlmeidaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Uerj), Faculdade de Odontologia, Ortodontia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, United States.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraoral devices have increasingly assumed a key role in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, but there are limitations to their indication and side effects that result from their continuous use, as well as the use of the continuous positive airway pressure device.

objectivesTo evaluate the changes in dental positioning caused by the continuous use of mandibular advancement devices.

methodsA prospective longitudinal study with a sample of 15 patients, with evaluation of complete documentation after a mean time of 6.47 months, assessed changes in dental positioning due to the use of the Twin Block oral device for the treatment of patients with apnea. The following variables were evaluated: overjet, overbite, upper and lower intermolar distances, upper and lower intercanine distances, Little's irregularity index and the incisor mandibular plane angle. An intraclass correlation test was performed and a correlation index>0.08 was accepted. After verifying the normal sample distribution (Shapiro-Wilks), a parametric test was used (t test), with a significance level set at 5%.

resultsThere was a decrease in the values of overjet, overbite and Little's irregularity index, whereas there was an increase in the lower intercanine distance and IMPA values. All these variables are influenced, at different levels, by the forward inclination of the lower incisors, an action that can be expected due to the force applied by the device on the dentition. The other variables did not show statistically significant differences.

conclusionAfter a mean time of 6.47 months of use of the mandibular advancement device, there were statistically significant changes in the dental positioning, but they were not clinically relevant. However, it is relevant that this device is commonly in use over long periods of time, making the monitoring of these patients of the utmost importance for the duration of their therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCephalometryContinuous Positive Airway PressureDental ArchFemaleHumansIncisorLongitudinal StudiesMaleMandibular AdvancementMiddle AgedOpen BiteOverbiteProspective StudiesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAvanço mandibularContinuous positive airway pressureMandibular advancementObstructive sleep apnea syndromePressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreasSíndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono

Identifiers

PMID29102398
PMCPMC9442828
OpenAlexW2761799709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.