Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101711›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2018

Randomized trial of a clinic-based weight loss intervention in cancer survivors.

Justin C Brown, Rachel L Yung, Anita Gobbie-Hurder, Laura Shockro, Keelin O'Connor, Nancy Campbell, Jocelyn Kasper, Erica L Mayer, Sara M Tolaney, Ann H Partridge and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin C BrownDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Rachel L YungUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anita Gobbie-HurderDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura ShockroDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Keelin O'ConnorDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy CampbellDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Jocelyn KasperDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Erica L MayerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer A LigibelDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA. jennifer_ligibel@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Inflammation, Physical Activity, and Colon Cancer Recurrence and SurvivalK99CA218603 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BROWN, JUSTIN C · 2017 to 2018
$260k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA218603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis trial examined the efficacy of a clinic-based weight loss intervention in cancer survivors.

methodsThis single-center phase II trial randomized survivors of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies to a 15-week group-based weight loss intervention that included caloric restriction and physical activity (n = 30) or a wait-list control intervention (n = 30). The primary study outcome was body mass. Secondary study outcomes included body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, physical fitness using the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and concentrations of serum biomarkers.

resultsParticipants in the intervention group lost 5.6 ± 4.4% of baseline weight (4.6 ± 3.9 kg), whereas participants in the control group gained 0.2 ± 2.4% of baseline weight (0.2 ± 2.0 kg); intervention effect - 5.8% (95% CI - 7.8, - 3.8); - 4.8 kg (95% CI - 6.6, - 3.0); P = 0.0001. A larger proportion of participants in the intervention group lost ≥ 5% of baseline weight compared to the control group (43 vs 0%; P < 0.0001). The intervention led to reductions in fat mass (- 3.2 ± 0.7 kg; P < 0.0001), improvements in physical fitness (an increase of 22.6 ± 10.8 m on 6MWT; P = 0.03), and reductions in concentrations of insulin (- 7.7 ± 3.5 μU/mL; P = 0.004) and leptin (- 7.3 ± 4.0 ng/mL; P = 0.04).

conclusionA 15-week clinic-based weight loss intervention resulted in significant weight loss and improvements in body composition, physical fitness, and concentrations of serum biomarkers in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Weight loss programs provide a number of benefits for cancer survivors; survivors should inquire about the availability of lifestyle programs offered at their cancer center and within their local communities.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsAdultAmbulatory CareBody CompositionExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsObesityPhysical FitnessWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdipokinesBody compositionBody mass indexInflammationInsulinObesityPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29101711
PMCPMC5886810
OpenAlexW2507674233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.