ArticleUpdates in surgery2017
Laparoscopic appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Risk factors for postoperative morbidity following appendectomy in the elderly: a nationwide prospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021Article
- Appendectomy versus conservative treatment with antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of patient-centered outcomes (the ACTUAA prospective multicenter trial).International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- [Antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis in adults].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Review
- Beware of the difference between randomized controlled trials and daily clinical practice (in reply to "Surgery or antibiotics for acute appendicitis? Take care about study's design and methodology!", by Ceresoli M, et al.).Updates in surgery · 2018Article
- Surgery or antibiotics for acute appendicitis? Take care about study's design and methodology!Updates in surgery · 2018Article
- Is early appendectomy in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis mandatory? A prospective study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJESArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute lower abdominal pain leading patients to the emergency department. Significant debate remains on whether AA should be operated or not. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in seven Italian Hospitals, with the aim to assess safety and feasibility both nonoperative management with antibiotics (AT) and surgical therapy with appendectomy (ST) for patients with AA. Data regarding all patients discharged from the participating centers with a diagnosis of appendicitis from January 1st, 2014 to December 31st, 2014 were collected retrospectively. Follow-up data were collected from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016. The complication-free treatment success of AT (53.7%) was significantly inferior to that of ST (86.4%) (P < 0.0001). Patients initially treated with antibiotics reported an index admission AT failure rate of 20.9% and a recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up of 20.3%. No statistically significant difference was found when comparing AT and ST groups for the outcome of interest post-operative complications (13.5 vs 13.6%, P = 0.834). Patients treated with AT were discharged home earlier than patients in the ST group (3.38 ± 1.89 vs 4.84 ± 2.69 days, P < 0.0001). Due to the low rates of complications occurred in the ST group and the high efficacy of the surgical therapy, laparoscopic appendectomy still represents the most effective treatment for patients with AA. AT is associated with shorter hospital stay and faster return to normal activity, and may prevent from appendectomies around 80% of patients who leave the hospital with clinical recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.