Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101666›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2017

Laparoscopic appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter cohort study.

Gaetano Poillucci, Lorenzo Mortola, Mauro Podda, Salomone Di Saverio, Laura Casula, Chiara Gerardi, Nicola Cillara, Luigi Presenti, ACTUAA-R Collaborative Working Group on Acute Appendicitis

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Risk factors for postoperative morbidity following appendectomy in the elderly: a nationwide prospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis in adults].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gaetano PoillucciII Clinica Chirurgica, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo MortolaSurgical Science Department, Cagliari State University, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy.
Mauro PoddaDepartment of Surgery: General, Emergency and Robotic Surgical Unit, San Francesco Hospital, ASSL Nuoro, ATS Sardegna, Via Mannironi, 1, 08100, Nuoro, Italy. mauropodda@ymail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-0883
Salomone Di SaverioDepartment of Emergency Surgery and Trauma Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Laura CasulaDepartment of Medicine and Public Health, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy.
Chiara GerardiIRCCS "Mario Negri" Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy.
Nicola CillaraDepartment of Surgery, Santissima Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Luigi PresentiDepartment of Surgery, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
ACTUAA-R Collaborative Working Group on Acute Appendicitis
ATS Sardegna (Italy) · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITSantissima Trinità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute lower abdominal pain leading patients to the emergency department. Significant debate remains on whether AA should be operated or not. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in seven Italian Hospitals, with the aim to assess safety and feasibility both nonoperative management with antibiotics (AT) and surgical therapy with appendectomy (ST) for patients with AA. Data regarding all patients discharged from the participating centers with a diagnosis of appendicitis from January 1st, 2014 to December 31st, 2014 were collected retrospectively. Follow-up data were collected from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016. The complication-free treatment success of AT (53.7%) was significantly inferior to that of ST (86.4%) (P < 0.0001). Patients initially treated with antibiotics reported an index admission AT failure rate of 20.9% and a recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up of 20.3%. No statistically significant difference was found when comparing AT and ST groups for the outcome of interest post-operative complications (13.5 vs 13.6%, P = 0.834). Patients treated with AT were discharged home earlier than patients in the ST group (3.38 ± 1.89 vs 4.84 ± 2.69 days, P < 0.0001). Due to the low rates of complications occurred in the ST group and the high efficacy of the surgical therapy, laparoscopic appendectomy still represents the most effective treatment for patients with AA. AT is associated with shorter hospital stay and faster return to normal activity, and may prevent from appendectomies around 80% of patients who leave the hospital with clinical recovery.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleHumansMalePropensity ScoreAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsAppendectomyAppendicitisMulticenter studyMultivariate analysisPropensity score analysis

Identifiers

PMID29101666
OpenAlexW2766667908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.