Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

Quality of medication information in discharge summaries from hospitals: an audit of electronic patient records.

Beate Hennie Garcia, Berit Svendsen Djønne, Frode Skjold, Ellen Marie Mellingen, Trine Iversen Aag

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of integrated medicines management on quality of discharge medication information-a secondary endpoint in a randomized controlled trial.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beate Hennie GarciaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. beate.garcia@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-0383
Berit Svendsen DjønneDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Frode SkjoldDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Ellen Marie MellingenHospital Pharmacy of North Norway Trust (Sykehusapotek Nord HF), Postboks 6147, Langnes, 9291, Tromsø, Norway.
Trine Iversen AagHospital Pharmacy of North Norway Trust (Sykehusapotek Nord HF), Postboks 6147, Langnes, 9291, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Low quality of medication information in discharge summaries from hospitals may jeopardize optimal therapy and put the patient at risk for medication errors and adverse drug events. Objective To audit the quality of medication information in discharge summaries and explore factors associated with the quality. Setting Helgelandssykehuset Mo i Rana, a rural hospital in central Norway. Method For each month in 2013, we randomly selected 60 discharge summaries from the Department of Medicine and Surgery (totally 720) and evaluated the medication information using eight Norwegian quality criteria. Main outcome measure Mean score per discharge summary ranging from 0 (lowest quality) to 16 (highest quality). Results Mean score per discharge summary was 7.4 (SD 2.8; range 0-14), significantly higher when evaluating medications used regularly compared to mediations used as needed (7.80 vs. 6.52; p < 0.001). Lowest score was achieved for quality criteria concerning generic names, indications for medication use, reasons why changes had been made and information about the source for information. Factors associated with increased quality scores are increasing numbers of medications and male patients. Increasing age seemed to be associated with a reduced score, while type of department was not associated with the quality. Conclusion In discharge summaries from 2013, we identified a low quality of medication information in accordance with the Norwegian quality criteria. Actions for improvement are necessary and follow-up studies to monitor quality are needed.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Discharge SummariesQuality Assurance, Health CareSex FactorsClinical auditCommunicationHospitalMedication SystemsNorwayPatient discharge summaryQuality of health care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.