Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

A multifaceted intervention to reduce guideline non-adherence among prescribing physicians in Dutch hospitals.

Jacqueline M Bos, Stephanie Natsch, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Johan L W Pot, J Elsbeth Nagtegaal, Andre Wieringa, Gert Jan van der Wilt, Peter A G M De Smet, Cornelis Kramers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline M BosDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. jm.bos@cwz.nl.
Stephanie NatschDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan L W PotDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
J Elsbeth NagtegaalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Andre WieringaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Gert Jan van der WiltDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter A G M De SmetDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis KramersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Meander Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLIsala · NL

Funding

ZonMw 171101004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Despite the potential of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes, adherence to guidelines by prescribers is inconsistent. Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether an approach of introducing an educational programme for prescribers in the hospital combined with audit and feedback by the hospital pharmacist reduces non-adherence of prescribing physicians to key pharmacotherapeutic guidelines. Setting This prospective intervention study with a before-after design evaluated patients at surgical, urological and orthopaedic wards. Method An educational program covering pain management, antithrombotics, fluid and electrolyte management, prescribing in case of renal insufficiency, application of radiographic contrast agents and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was presented to prescribers on the participating wards. Hospital pharmacists performed medication safety consultations, combining medication review of patients who are at risk for drug related problems with visits to ward physicians. Main outcome measure The outcome measure was the proportion of the admissions of patients in which the physician did not adhere to one or more of the included guidelines. Difference was expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Results 1435 Admissions of 1378 patients during the usual care period and 1195 admissions of 1090 patients during the intervention period were included. Non-adherence was observed significantly less often during the intervention period [21.8% (193/886)] as compared to the usual care period [30.5% (332/1089)]. The adjusted OR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.76). Conclusion This study shows that education and support of the prescribing physician can reduce guideline non-adherence at surgical wards.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPharmacy Service, HospitalPhysiciansProspective StudiesEducationGuideline adherenceMedication reviewPatient safetyPrescribingThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID29101616
PMCPMC5694513
OpenAlexW2766959576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.