Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101447›Full record

Trial reportSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2017

Short video interventions to reduce mental health stigma: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in nursing high schools.

Petr Winkler, Miroslava Janoušková, Jiří Kožený, Jiří Pasz, Karolína Mladá, Aneta Weissová, Eva Tušková, Sara Evans-Lacko

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Virtual patients in undergraduate psychiatry education: a systematic review and synthesis.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Petr WinklerDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic. petr.winkler@nudz.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-0051
Miroslava JanouškováDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Jiří KoženýDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Jiří PaszDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Karolína MladáDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Aneta WeissováDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Eva TuškováDepartment of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, Klecany, 250 67, Czech Republic.
Sara Evans-LackoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
National Institute of Mental Health · CZCharles University · CZKing's College London · GB

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LO1611, National Program of Sustainability 1 programNorwegian Funds CZ.11/MGS/058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to assess whether short video interventions could reduce stigma among nursing students.

methodsA multi-centre, randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participating schools were randomly selected and randomly assigned to receive: (1) an informational leaflet, (2) a short video intervention or (3) a seminar involving direct contact with a service user. The Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness (CAMI) and Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) were selected as primary outcome measures. SPANOVA models were built and Cohen's d calculated to assess the overall effects in each of the trial arms.

resultsCompared to the baseline, effect sizes immediately after the intervention were small in the flyer arm (CAMI: d = 0.25; RIBS: d = 0.07), medium in the seminar arm (CAMI: d = 0.61; RIBS: d = 0.58), and medium in the video arm (CAMI: d = 0.49 RIBS: d = 0.26; n = 237). Effect sizes at the follow-up were vanishing in the flyer arm (CAMI: d = 0.05; RIBS: d = 0.04), medium in the seminar arm (CAMI: d = 0.43; RIBS: d = 0.26; n = 254), and small in the video arm (CAMI: d = 0.22 RIBS: d = 0.21; n = 237).

conclusionSeminar had the strongest and relatively stable effect on students' attitudes and intended behaviour, but the effect of short video interventions was also considerable and stable over time. Since short effective video interventions are relatively cheap, conveniently accessible and easy to disseminate globally, we recommend them for further research and development.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSocial StigmaVideotape RecordingAdolescentCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersSchools, NursingStudents, NursingYoung AdultAudio–visual mediaHealth personnel attitudesMental healthRandomised controlled trialStigmatisation

Identifiers

PMID29101447
OpenAlexW2766727703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.