Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101325›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Influence of facial feedback during a cooperative human-robot task in schizophrenia.

Laura Cohen, Mahdi Khoramshahi, Robin N Salesse, Catherine Bortolon, Piotr Słowiński, Chao Zhai, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, Mario Di Bernardo, Delphine Capdevielle, Ludovic Marin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Care provided by humanoid robots: a scoping review.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Laura CohenLearning Algorithms and Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mahdi KhoramshahiLearning Algorithms and Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Robin N SalesseEuroMov, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Catherine BortolonUniversity Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU, Montpellier, France.
Piotr SłowińskiDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6612-9902
Chao ZhaiDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Krasimira Tsaneva-AtanasovaDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-7051
Mario Di BernardoDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Delphine CapdevielleUniversity Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU, Montpellier, France.
Ludovic MarinEuroMov, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Richard C SchmidtPsychology Department, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Benoit G BardyEuroMov, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Aude BillardLearning Algorithms and Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane RaffardUniversity Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU, Montpellier, France. s-raffard@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-0323
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBCollege of the Holy Cross · USInstitut Universitaire de France · FRNeuropsychiatrie : Recherche Epidemiologique et Clinique · FRUniversité Paul-Valéry Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid progress in the area of humanoid robots offers tremendous possibilities for investigating and improving social competences in people with social deficits, but remains yet unexplored in schizophrenia. In this study, we examined the influence of social feedbacks elicited by a humanoid robot on motor coordination during a human-robot interaction. Twenty-two schizophrenia patients and twenty-two matched healthy controls underwent a collaborative motor synchrony task with the iCub humanoid robot. Results revealed that positive social feedback had a facilitatory effect on motor coordination in the control participants compared to non-social positive feedback. This facilitatory effect was not present in schizophrenia patients, whose social-motor coordination was similarly impaired in social and non-social feedback conditions. Furthermore, patients' cognitive flexibility impairment and antipsychotic dosing were negatively correlated with patients' ability to synchronize hand movements with iCub. Overall, our findings reveal that patients have marked difficulties to exploit facial social cues elicited by a humanoid robot to modulate their motor coordination during human-robot interaction, partly accounted for by cognitive deficits and medication. This study opens new perspectives for comprehension of social deficits in this mental disorder.

Indexed as

FeedbackRoboticsSchizophrenic PsychologySocial BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSocial PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29101325
PMCPMC5670132
OpenAlexW2761303892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.