SynthesisBMJ open2017
Post-operative patient-related risk factors for chronic pain after total knee replacement: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hotspots and frontiers in chronic postoperative pain: a bibliometric analysis and review (2004-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients at Risk of Poorer Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Pooled it
- Suprascapular nerve blockage for painful shoulder pathology - a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment techniques.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Pooled it
- Survivorship of the dual-mobility construct in elective primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Did the dislocation risk after primary total hip arthroplasty decrease over time? A meta-analysis across six decades.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Covid-19 in end-stage renal disease patients with renal replacement therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Time to reconsider the routine use of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty surgery.The bone & joint journal · 2021Pooled it
- Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- With or without a Tourniquet? A Comparative Study on Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients without Comorbidities.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- Phase 3 Trials of Enhanced Versus Usual Care Physical Therapy for Patients at Risk of Poor Outcome Following Knee Arthroplasty: A Perspective on Meaning and a Way Forward.Physical therapy · 2021Trial
- Long-term survival outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty: An implant-level systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and registry data with more than 13 years follow-up.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Review
- Development of risk prediction model for chronic pain after knee replacement surgery: protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Fixed Versus Rotating Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective 24-Month Longitudinal Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Repeat-CRFA-Free Survival After Ultrasound-Guided Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Matsuoka Direct Nerve Targeting (MDNT) Technique for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,025 Consecutive Knees.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Postoperative Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Relation to Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement in Jordan.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The influence of pain catastrophizing on pain and function after knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify postoperative patient-related risk factors for chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR).
designThe systematic review protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42016041374). MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from inception to October 2016 with no language restrictions. Key articles were also tracked in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science. Cohort studies evaluating the association between patient-related factors in the first 3 months postoperatively and pain at 6 months or longer after primary TKR surgery were included. Screening, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were undertaken by two reviewers. The primary outcome was pain severity in the replaced knee measured with a patient-reported outcome measure at 6 months or longer after TKR. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and other aspects of pain recommended by the core outcome set for chronic pain after TKR.
resultsAfter removal of duplicates, 16 430 articles were screened, of which 805 were considered potentially relevant. After detailed evaluation of full-text articles, 14 studies with data from 1168 participants were included. Postoperative patient-related factors included acute pain (eight studies), function (five studies) and psychosocial factors (four studies). The included studies had diverse methods for assessment of potential risk factors and outcomes, and therefore narrative synthesis was conducted. For all postoperative factors, there was insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about the association with chronic pain after TKR. Selection bias was a potential risk for all studies, as none were reported to be conducted at multiple centres.
conclusionThis systematic review found insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about the association between any postoperative patient-related factors and chronic pain after TKR. Further high-quality research is required to provide a robust evidence base on postoperative risk factors, and inform the development and evaluation of targeted interventions to optimise patients' outcomes after TKR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.