Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29101141›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Incidence of patient safety events and process-related human failures during intra-hospital transportation of patients: retrospective exploration from the institutional incident reporting system.

Shu-Hui Yang, Jih-Shuin Jerng, Li-Chin Chen, Yu-Tsu Li, Hsiao-Fang Huang, Chao-Ling Wu, Jing-Yuan Chan, Szu-Fen Huang, Huey-Wen Liang, Jui-Sheng Sun

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shu-Hui YangDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jih-Shuin JerngDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Chin ChenCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Tsu LiCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Fang HuangCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Ling WuDepartment of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jing-Yuan ChanCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Szu-Fen HuangDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huey-Wen LiangCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Sheng SunCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-hospital transportation (IHT) might compromise patient safety because of different care settings and higher demand on the human operation. Reports regarding the incidence of IHT-related patient safety events and human failures remain limited.

objectiveTo perform a retrospective analysis of IHT-related events, human failures and unsafe acts.

settingA hospital-wide process for the IHT and database from the incident reporting system in a medical centre in Taiwan.

participantsAll eligible IHT-related patient safety events between January 2010 to December 2015 were included.

main outcome measuresIncidence rate of IHT-related patient safety events, human failure modes, and types of unsafe acts.

resultsThere were 206 patient safety events in 2 009 013 IHT sessions (102.5 per 1 000 000 sessions). Most events (n=148, 71.8%) did not involve patient harm, and process events (n=146, 70.9%) were most common. Events at the location of arrival (n=101, 49.0%) were most frequent; this location accounted for 61.0% and 44.2% of events with patient harm and those without harm, respectively (p<0.001). Of the events with human failures (n=186), the most common related process step was the preparation of the transportation team (n=91, 48.9%). Contributing unsafe acts included perceptual errors (n=14, 7.5%), decision errors (n=56, 30.1%), skill-based errors (n=48, 25.8%), and non-compliance (n=68, 36.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that human failure found in the arrival and hand-off sub-process (OR 4.84, p<0.001) was associated with increased patient harm, whereas the presence of omission (OR 0.12, p<0.001) was associated with less patient harm.

conclusionsThis study shows a need to reduce human failures to prevent patient harm during intra-hospital transportation. We suggest that the transportation team pay specific attention to the sub-process at the location of arrival and prevent errors other than omissions. Long-term monitoring of IHT-related events is also warranted.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPatient HarmRetrospective StudiesRisk ManagementTaiwanTransportation of Patientshuman failureincident reporting systemintra-hospital transporationpatient safetyrisk managementteamwork

Identifiers

PMID29101141
PMCPMC5695373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.