Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29100554›Full record

ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2017

Intersociety policy statement on the use of whole-exome sequencing in the critically ill newborn infant.

Alessandro Borghesi, Maria Antonietta Mencarelli, Luigi Memo, Giovanni Battista Ferrero, Andrea Bartuli, Maurizio Genuardi, Mauro Stronati, Alberto Villani, Alessandra Renieri, Giovanni Corsello and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Asynchronous telemedicine for clinical genetics consultations in the NICU: a single center's solution.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessandro BorghesiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinco San Matteo, Piazzale Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. a.borghesi@smatteo.pv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-9144
Maria Antonietta MencarelliGenetica Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Luigi MemoPediatric Department, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy.
Giovanni Battista FerreroDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Andrea BartuliRare Diseases and Medical Genetic Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio GenuardiInstitute of Genomic Medicine, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Mauro StronatiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinco San Matteo, Piazzale Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Alberto VillaniPediatric and Infectious Disease Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra RenieriGenetica Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Giovanni CorselloOperative Unit of Pediatrics and Neonatal Intensive Therapy, Mother and Child Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
their respective Scientific Societies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology and the decrease in costs for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequening (WGS), has prompted its clinical application in several fields of medicine. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for the use of NGS in the field of neonatal medicine and in the diagnosis of genetic diseases in critically ill newborn infants. As a consequence, NGS may be underused with reduced diagnostic success rate, or overused, with increased costs for the healthcare system. Most genetic diseases may be already expressed during the neonatal age, but their identification may be complicated by nonspecific presentation, especially in the setting of critical clinical conditions. The differential diagnosis process in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may be time-consuming, uncomfortable for the patient due to repeated sampling, and ineffective in reaching a molecular diagnosis during NICU stay. Serial gene sequencing (Sanger sequencing) may be successful only for conditions for which the clinical phenotype strongly suggests a diagnostic hypothesis and for genetically homogeneous diseases. Newborn screenings with Guthrie cards, which vary from country to country, are designed to only test for a few dozen genetic diseases out of the more than 6000 diseases for which a genetic characterization is available. The use of WES in selected cases in the NICU may overcome these issues. We present an intersociety document that aims to define the best indications for the use of WES in different clinical scenarios in the NICU. We propose that WES is used in the NICU for critically ill newborn infants when an early diagnosis is desirable to guide the clinical management during NICU stay, when a strong hypothesis cannot be formulated based on the clinical phenotype or the disease is genetically heterogeneous, and when specific non-genetic laboratory tests are not available. The use of WES may reduce the time for diagnosis in infants during NICU stay and may eventually result in cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicExome SequencingFemaleGenetic TestingGenome, HumanHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalItalyMaleNeonatal ScreeningOutcome Assessment, Health CarePolicy MakingDiagnosisGeneticGenomeMendelianNeonatal intensive care unitNeonateNICUWESWGSWhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29100554
PMCPMC5670717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.