ArticlePloS one2017
Performance verification of the new fully automated Aquios flow cytometer PanLeucogate (PLG) platform for CD4-T-lymphocyte enumeration in South Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Point-of-Care VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease Test in 7 Countries.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The impact of a CD4 tiered service model on interlaboratory referral distances in South Africa.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of CD4 count trends in South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2024Article
- Economic impact of extending reflexed cryptococcal antigenaemia CD4 threshold in South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2024Article
- Modelling CD4 reagent usage across a national hierarchal network of laboratories in South Africa.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of fixed-panel, multicolour ClearLLab 10C at an academic flow cytometry laboratory in Johannesburg, South Africa.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Newly implemented community CD4 service in Tshwaragano, Northern Cape province, South Africa, positively impacts result turn-around time.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Commercial DURAClone panels for extending the repertoire of multicolour immunophenotypic panels in an academic flow cytometry laboratory in South Africa.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation and validation of a novel 10-color flow cytometer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- New automated analysis to monitor neutrophil function point-of-care in the intensive care unit after trauma.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2020Article
- Age, absolute CD4 count, and CD4 percentage in relation to HPV infection and the stage of cervical disease in HIV-1-positive women.Medicine · 2020Article
- Time of HIV diagnosis, CD4 count and viral load at antenatal care start and delivery in South Africa.PloS one · 2020Article
- Categorising specimen referral delays for CD4 testing: How inter-laboratory distances and travel times impact turn-around time across a national laboratory service in South Africa.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2020Article
- A flow-through cell counting assay for point-of-care enumeration of CD4 T-cells.Journal of virological methods · 2019Article
- Assessment of the AQUIOS flow cytometer - An automated sample preparation system for CD4 lymphocyte PanLeucogating enumeration.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2019Article
- Neutrophil heterogeneity and its role in infectious complications after severe trauma.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) offers wide-scale CD4 testing through a network of laboratories in South Africa. A new "load and go" cytometer (Aquios CL, Beckman Coulter), developed with a PLG protocol, was validated against the predicate PLG method on the Beckman Coulter FC500 MPL/CellMek platform.
methodsRemnant routine EDTA blood CD4 reference results were compared to results from two Aquios/PLG instruments (n = 205) and a further n = 1885 samples tested to assess daily testing capacity. Reproducibility was assessed using ImmunotrolTM and patient samples with low, medium, high CD4 counts. Data was analyzed using GraphPad software for general statistics and Bland-Altman (BA) analyses. The percentage similarity (%Sim) was used to measure the level of agreement (accuracy) of the new platform versus the predicate and variance (%SimCV) reported to indicate precision of difference to predicate.
results205 samples were tested with a CD4 count range of 2-1228 cells/μl (median 365cells/μl). BA analysis revealed an overall -40.5±44.0cells/μl bias (LOA of 126.8 to 45.8cells/μl) and %Sim showing good agreement and tight precision to predicate results (94.83±5.39% with %SimCV = 5.69%). Workflow analysis (n = 1885) showed similar outcomes 94.9±8.9% (CV of 9.4%) and 120 samples/day capacity. Excellent intra-instrument reproducibility was noted (%Sim 98.7±2.8% and %SimCV of 2.8%). 5-day reproducibility using internal quality control material (Immunotrol™) showed tight precision (reported %CV of 4.69 and 7.62 for Normal and Low material respectively) and instrument stability.
conclusionThe Aquios/PLG CD4 testing platform showed clinically acceptable result reporting to existing predicate results, with good system stability and reproducibility with a slight negative but precise bias. This system can replace the faded XL cytometers in low- to medium volume CD4 testing laboratories, using the standardized testing protocol, with better staff utilization especially where technical skills are lacking. Central monitoring of on-board quality assessment data facilitates proactive maintenance and networked instrument performance monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.