Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29099721›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2017

Automated detection of breast cancer in resected specimens with fluorescence lifetime imaging.

Jennifer E Phipps, Dimitris Gorpas, Jakob Unger, Morgan Darrow, Richard J Bold, Laura Marcu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Deep learning in macroscopic diffuse optical imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E PhippsBiomedical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0004-2908
Dimitris GorpasBiomedical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-8087
Jakob UngerBiomedical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Morgan DarrowDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States of America.
Richard J BoldDepartment of Surgery, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States of America.
Laura MarcuBiomedical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USUC Davis Health · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging/Spectroscopy System For Robotic Cancer Surgery GuidanceR01CA187427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BIRKELAND, ANDREW CHARLES, MARCU, LAURA · 2014 to 2025
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Re-excision rates for breast cancer lumpectomy procedures are currently nearly 25% due to surgeons relying on inaccurate or incomplete methods of evaluating specimen margins. The objective of this study was to determine if cancer could be automatically detected in breast specimens from mastectomy and lumpectomy procedures by a classification algorithm that incorporated parameters derived from fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIm). This study generated a database of co-registered histologic sections and FLIm data from breast cancer specimens (N  =  20) and a support vector machine (SVM) classification algorithm able to automatically detect cancerous, fibrous, and adipose breast tissue. Classification accuracies were greater than 97% for automated detection of cancerous, fibrous, and adipose tissue from breast cancer specimens. The classification worked equally well for specimens scanned by hand or with a mechanical stage, demonstrating that the system could be used during surgery or on excised specimens. The ability of this technique to simply discriminate between cancerous and normal breast tissue, in particular to distinguish fibrous breast tissue from tumor, which is notoriously challenging for optical techniques, leads to the conclusion that FLIm has great potential to assess breast cancer margins. Identification of positive margins before waiting for complete histologic analysis could significantly reduce breast cancer re-excision rates.

Indexed as

FluorescenceMastectomy, SegmentalAdipose TissueAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFibrosisHumansMiddle AgedOptical ImagingSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID29099721
PMCPMC7485302
OpenAlexW2766499671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.