Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29099619›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2018

Mild Elevation of Pulmonary Arterial Pressure as a Predictor of Mortality.

Philipp Douschan, Gabor Kovacs, Alexander Avian, Vasile Foris, Fabian Gruber, Andrea Olschewski, Horst Olschewski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. International Liver Transplantation Society practice guideline update on portopulmonary hypertension.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Clinical Updates in Pulmonary Hypertension.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Update on pulmonary hypertension.Respiratory research · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lipid Ratios for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pulmonary Hypertension.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp Douschan1 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, and.
Gabor Kovacs1 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, and.
Alexander Avian3 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Vasile Foris1 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, and.
Fabian Gruber1 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, and.
Andrea Olschewski2 Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research, Graz, Austria; and.
Horst Olschewski1 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNormal mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) is 14.0 ± 3.3 mm Hg (mean ± SD). The prognostic relevance of mildly elevated mPAP not fulfilling the definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH; mPAP ≥ 25 mm Hg) has not been prospectively evaluated in a real-world setting.

objectivesTo assess the association of resting mPAP with all-cause mortality in a retrospective and a prospective cohort of patients with unexplained dyspnea and/or at risk of PH.

methodsPrognostic cutoffs were calculated by means of 1) classification and regression tree (CART) analysis without any preset thresholds, and 2) preset thresholds on the basis of literature data defining mPAP as lower-normal (≤mean + 1 SD), upper-normal (between mean + 1 SD and mean + 2 SD), borderline (between mean + 2 SD and 25 mm Hg), and manifest PH (≥25 mm Hg). We performed univariate and multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and comorbidities. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe enrolled 547 patients, of whom 137, 56, 64, and 290 presented with lower-normal, upper-normal, or borderline mPAP, and manifest PH, respectively. The CART analysis on mPAP discriminated three prognostic groups: mPAP less than 17 mm Hg, 17 to 26 mm Hg, and greater than 26 mm Hg, with significantly decreasing survival. The univariate analysis on the basis of preset thresholds showed that upper-normal mPAP, borderline mPAP, and manifest PH were significantly associated with poor survival compared with lower-normal mPAP. In the multivariate model, considering age and comorbidities, only borderline mPAP (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.97; P = 0.022) and manifest PH (hazard ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-9.12; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with poor survival.

conclusionsIn patients at risk for PH and/or with unexplained dyspnea, CART analysis detects prognostic thresholds at a resting mPAP of 17 mm Hg and 26 mm Hg, and values between 20 mm Hg and 25 mm Hg represent an independent predictor of poor survival. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01607502).

Indexed as

AgedArterial PressureAustriaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesPulmonary ArteryRetrospective Studiesborderline pulmonary arterial pressureprognosispulmonary arterial pressure increasepulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.