ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2018
Short article: The endoscopic and histologic findings of infants who have experienced brief resolved unexplained events.
Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of the American Academy of Pediatrics Brief Resolved Unexplained Event Guidelines on Gastrointestinal Testing and Prescribing Practices.The Journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) describes an event associated with a change in muscle tone, color, respiration, and responsiveness that is unexplained after an appropriate examination. Some infants with higher risk BRUE may undergo endoscopy as part of their evaluation.
objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to identify the endoscopic findings in infants who have experienced a higher risk BRUE. We also compared the characteristics, prenatal, natal, and postnatal risk factors between 23 infants who underwent endoscopic evaluation and 23 race-matched/sex-matched/term-matched/preterm-matched infants who did not undergo endoscopic evaluation.
methodsThis was a retrospective descriptive study. Infants were identified from a query of medical records using the ICD-10 code for BRUE (R68.13).
resultsOf 119 infants with BRUE, 23 infants with higher risk BRUE underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Apnea (87%) was the most common presentation of BRUE. Most were female (57%) with a mean age at BRUE presentation of 2.73 months. We found 10 (43.5%) term infants and 13 (56.5%) preterm infants in our study. There were no significant differences in characteristics, prenatal, natal, and postnatal risk factors between the infants who underwent endoscopy and those who did not undergo endoscopy. The most common abnormal endoscopic finding was lymphonodular hyperplasia (LNH) associated with eosinophilia in the rectosigmoid colon. The proportion of females in the LNH group was significantly higher than the non-LNH group.
conclusionRectosigmoid LNH and eosinophilia, which are associated with milk soy protein intolerance (MSPI), were the most common findings on endoscopic evaluation. Although there is no proof of causation between MSPI and BRUE, MSPI should be considered in the differential diagnosis for higher risk BRUE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.