Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29099398›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2019

Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing.

Kasturi Ganesh Barki, Amitava Das, Sriteja Dixith, Piya Das Ghatak, Shomita Mathew-Steiner, Elizabeth Schwab, Savita Khanna, Daniel J Wozniak, Sashwati Roy, Chandan K Sen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06312267 (Reducing Wound Infections Using Bioelectric Wound Dressings), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06312267 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Wound Infections Using Bioelectric Wound Dressings

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2024 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsBioelectric dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Electroceuticals: Unlocking the promise of therapies.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current and Future Developments in Wound Healing.Facial plastic surgery : FPS · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Research progress of metal micro-battery dressings in wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Review
  20. Swine Model of Biofilm Infection and Invisible Wounds.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kasturi Ganesh BarkiThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Amitava DasThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Sriteja DixithThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Piya Das GhatakThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Shomita Mathew-SteinerThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Elizabeth SchwabThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Savita KhannaThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Daniel J WozniakThe Ohio State University, Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology, Center for Microbial Interface Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Sashwati RoyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Chandan K SenThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Based Therapies, Department of Surgery, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Vitamin E Neuroprotection: Novel Molecular MechanismsR01NS042617 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2002 to 2021
$3.9M
Wound Healing Endpoint and RecurrenceR01NR015676 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, ROY, SASHWATI · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Redox Control of Wound HealingR01GM069589 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2004 to 2013
$2.3M
Tissue Oxygenation and Wound HealingR01GM077185 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2007 to 2016
$2.3M
Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Pseudomonas biofilms and immunityR01AI097511 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Mechanisms Underlying Impaired Diabetic Wound HealingR01DK114718 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Mechanisms underlying impaired diabetic wound healingR01DK076566 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Mechanisms underlying impaired diabetic wound healingR56DK076566 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2016 to 2016
$347k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097511NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076566NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114718NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK076566NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077185NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042617NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was designed to employ electroceutical principles, as an alternative to pharmacological intervention, to manage wound biofilm infection. Mechanism of action of a United States Food and Drug Administration-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was tested in an established porcine chronic wound polymicrobial biofilm infection model involving inoculation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Acinetobacter baumannii 19606.

backgroundBacterial biofilms represent a major wound complication. Resistance of biofilm toward pharmacologic interventions calls for alternative therapeutic strategies. Weak electric field has anti-biofilm properties. We have previously reported the development of WED involving patterned deposition of Ag and Zn on fabric. When moistened, WED generates a weak electric field without any external power supply and can be used as any other disposable dressing.

methodsWED dressing was applied within 2 hours of wound infection to test its ability to prevent biofilm formation. Alternatively, WED was applied after 7 days of infection to study disruption of established biofilm. Wounds were treated with placebo dressing or WED twice a week for 56 days.

resultsScanning electron microscopy demonstrated that WED prevented and disrupted wound biofilm aggregates. WED accelerated functional wound closure by restoring skin barrier function. WED blunted biofilm-induced expression of (1) P. aeruginosa quorum sensing mvfR (pqsR), rhlR and lasR genes, and (2) miR-9 and silencing of E-cadherin. E-cadherin is critically required for skin barrier function. Furthermore, WED rescued against biofilm-induced persistent inflammation by circumventing nuclear factor kappa B activation and its downstream cytokine responses.

conclusionThis is the first pre-clinical porcine mechanistic study to recognize the potential of electroceuticals as an effective platform technology to combat wound biofilm infection.

Indexed as

BandagesBiofilmsWound HealingAnimalsElectricityEquipment DesignFemaleSwineWound Infection

Identifiers

PMID29099398
PMCPMC6568008
OpenAlexW2766541644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.