Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098521›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019

The Results of Stricter Inclusion Criteria in an Immunomagnetic Detection Study of Micrometastatic Cells in Bone Marrow of Uveal Melanoma Patients - Relevance for Dormancy.

Nils Eide, Ragnar S Faye, Hanne K Høifødt, Leiv Sandvik, Geir A Qvale, Rowan Faber, Peter Jebsen, Gunnar Kvalheim, Øystein Fodstad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nils EideDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Post box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. uxeidn@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-7506
Ragnar S FayeDepartment of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne K HøifødtDepartment of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital HF and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Leiv SandvikDepartment of Statistics, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.
Geir A QvaleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Post box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Rowan FaberDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Post box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Peter JebsenDivision of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar KvalheimDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein FodstadDepartment of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital HF and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50% of uveal melanoma patients develop metastases. We want to evaluate the effect of stricter criteria on our data from our previous study correlating survival and bone marrow (BM) micrometastasis results using our immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method. Mononuclear cell fractions (MNC) isolated from BM were examined for tumour cells and the patients were classified as BM positive (BM+) or BM negative (BM-). The study originally included 328 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma from 1997 to 2006. The cohort was limited to 217 patients when we introduced cyto- or histopathological verification of melanoma cells in the patient as a main new criterion for inclusion. Tumour cells were found in BM-samples in 38.7% (95% CI, 32-45) at enrolment. Until the latest work-up 43.8% (95% CI, 38-50) of patients had developed melanoma metastases. After a minimum follow-up time of 8.5 years, 60.4% (95% CI, 54-66) of patients had died. The causes were: melanoma metastases 69.5%, another type of cancer 5.4% and non-cancerous causes 19.5%. Overall median survival was shorter for the BM- patients (11.3 years) (95% CI, 10-12) compared to the BM+ (16.5 years) (95% CI, 12-14), p = 0.04, log rank test. All-cause mortality and specific melanoma mortality estimated after 12 year follow-up showed a highly significant difference comparing BM- and BM+, p = 0.010 and p = 0,017, respectively. IMS yields a high fraction of BM+ samples due to micrometastasis at diagnosis and these cells appear to have a positive prognostic impact strengthening our previous report. The late recurrences support the concept of tumour dormancy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunomagnetic SeparationMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorExclusion criteriaImmunomagnetic detectionMicrometastasis in bone marrowSurvivalTumour dormancyUveal melanoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.