Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098455›Full record

ReviewAIDS and behavior2018

Rectal Douching Associated with Receptive Anal Intercourse: A Literature Review.

Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Cody Lentz, Rebecca Giguere, Edward J Fuchs, Craig W Hendrix

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex Carballo-DiéguezHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ac72@cumc.columbia.edu.
Cody LentzHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rebecca GiguereHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Edward J FuchsDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Craig W HendrixDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USColumbia University · US

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Claude Ann Mellins · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
Tissue pharmacology imaging and modelingU19AI113127 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BUMPUS, NAMANDJE N · 2014 to 2018
$20.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI113127NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To inform the development of HIV-prevention rectal douches, we reviewed the scientific literature and online instructional videos on rectal douching associated with receptive anal intercourse (RAI). Up to 88% of men who practice RAI ever have douched, while 43-64% have douched recently. Of them, 87-97% douche before RAI and 13-48% afterwards. Water, occasionally mixed with soap or salt, is used most often, although up to 31% of men use commercial products. Douching is more common among individuals reporting substance use, sexually transmitted infections, or being HIV-infected. Scant literature is available on women's rectal douching practices, but it is apparently less frequent than among men (32 vs. 70%). Videos advise using 2-3 doses of liquid and retaining it for 10-30 s before expelling. These findings can inform the development of a safe and acceptable rectal douche for HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAdultAnti-Infective AgentsEnemaFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesTherapeutic IrrigationAnti-Infective AgentsEnemaHIV preventionMen who have sex with menMicrobicidesRectal douche

Identifiers

PMID29098455
PMCPMC5878987
OpenAlexW2767009933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.