Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098441›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2017

Communicative reprogramming non-curative hepatocellular carcinoma with low-dose metronomic chemotherapy, COX-2 inhibitor and PPAR-gamma agonist: a phase II trial.

I Walter, U Schulz, M Vogelhuber, K Wiedmann, E Endlicher, F Klebl, R Andreesen, W Herr, L Ghibelli, C Hackl and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. PPARs as Metabolic Sensors and Therapeutic Targets in Liver Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Exosomes and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

I WalterHealth Center Alte Mälzerei, Regensburg, Germany.
U SchulzDepartment Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
M VogelhuberDepartment Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
K WiedmannHospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
E EndlicherHealth Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
F KleblHealth Center Alte Mälzerei, Regensburg, Germany.
R AndreesenDepartment Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
W HerrDepartment Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
L GhibelliDepartment of Biology, Universita' di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
C HacklDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
R WiestUniversity Hospital for Visceral Surgery and Medicine Gastroenterology, Bern, Switzerland.
A ReichleDepartment Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. albrecht.reichle@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1821-7887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still challenging. A biomodulatory therapy approach targeting the communicative infrastructure of HCC, including metronomic low-dose chemotherapy with capecitabine, pioglitazone and rofecoxib, has been evaluated in patients with non-curative HCC. Altogether 38 patients were evaluable in this one-arm, multicenter phase II trial. The primary endpoint, median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6-3.79) for all evaluable patients and 8.4 months (95% CI: 0-18.13) for patients ≥ 6 weeks on protocol. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 months (95% CI: 4.08-9.31) and 9.4 months (95% CI: 4.82-13.97), respectively. Most common adverse events were edemas grade 3, which were commonly related to the advanced stage, with 66% of the patients suffering from liver cirrhosis. Exploratory data analyses showed significant impact of ECOG performance status grade 0 versus 1 and CLIP score 0/1 versus > 1 on OS, 9.8 months (95% CI: 4.24-15.35) versus 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.03-4.36; P = 0.002), and 9.8 months (95% CI: 3.23-16.37) versus 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.14-5.66; P = 0.009), respectively. Preceding tumor surgery had significant beneficial impact on survival, as well as maximal tumor diameter of < 5 cm. The correlation of C-reactive protein decrease with significantly improved OS underlines the close link between inflammation and tumor control. Biomodulatory therapy in advanced HCC may be a low toxic, efficacious treatment and principally demonstrates that such approaches should be followed further for treatment of advanced HCC.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicAgedalpha-FetoproteinsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCarcinoma, HepatocellularC-Reactive ProteinCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLactonesLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPioglitazoneAFP protein, humanalpha-FetoproteinsCapecitabineC-Reactive ProteinCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsLactonesPioglitazonePPAR gammarofecoxibSulfonesThiazolidinedionesAnakoinosisBiomodulatory therapyCOX-2 inhibitorHepatocellular carcinomaMetronomic low-dose chemotherapyPioglitazone

Identifiers

PMID29098441
PMCPMC5668342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.