Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098383›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT.

Noelia Martínez-Albert, Jose J Esteve-Taboada, Robert Montés-Micó

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Accommodating version of a schematic eye for emmetropia and myopia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noelia Martínez-AlbertOptometry Research Group (GIO), Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain. noelia.martinez@uv.es.
Jose J Esteve-TaboadaOptometry Research Group (GIO), Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
Robert Montés-MicóOptometry Research Group (GIO), Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad SAF2013-44510-R with ERDF fundsUniversitat de València UV-INV-PREDOC16F1-385061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs accommodation is a dynamic process changing anterior ocular structures, we aim to compare the repeatability between the biometric measurements taken with and without accommodation.

methodsThirty healthy right eyes were measured in a baseline and an accommodative state using Visante-OCT. Three repeated measurements were taken to obtain central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle-to-angle distance (ATA), iridocorneal angles (IA), and crystalline lens thickness (LT). Repeatability was evaluated by the calculation of coefficient of repeatability (CoR), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition, the Passing-Bablok regression method was applied.

resultsFor the nonaccommodative state, the CoR for CCT, ACD, ATA, and LT was 20.02 μm, 0.09 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.12 mm respectively. The CoR for CCT, ACD, ATA, and LT in the 6D-accommodative state was 20.85 μm, 0.08 mm, 0.26 mm, and 0.14 mm respectively. IA had similar results for both states; the CoR ranged between 3 and 4°, CoV was less than 4%, and the ICC was between 0.984-0.988. There were no significant differences between the three repeated measurements for any measurement.

conclusionsVisante-OCT provides good repeatability for anterior segment measurements for both accommodative and nonaccommodative states.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularAdolescentAdultAnterior Eye SegmentBiometryCorneaFemaleHumansLens, CrystallineMaleTomography, Optical CoherenceYoung AdultAccommodationAnterior segmentBiometryRepeatabilityVisante

Identifiers

PMID29098383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.