Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098379›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018

Influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo.

Tobias Härle, Mareike Luz, Sven Meyer, Felix Vahldiek, Pim van der Harst, Randy van Dijk, Daan Ties, Javier Escaned, Justin Davies, Albrecht Elsässer

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure on Fractional Flow Reserve in Saphenous Vein Grafts.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tobias HärleDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany. t.haerle@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-7044
Mareike LuzDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sven MeyerDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Felix VahldiekDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Pim van der HarstCenter for Medical Imaging, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Randy van DijkCenter for Medical Imaging, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daan TiesCenter for Medical Imaging, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Javier EscanedDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Justin DaviesHammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Albrecht ElsässerDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Klinikum Oldenburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLHammersmith Hospital · GBHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vitro was recently reported. We sought to analyze the influence of hydrostatic pressure, caused by the height difference between the distal and proximal pressure sensor after guidewire positioning in the interrogated vessel, on intracoronary pressure measurements in vivo. METHODS AND

resultsIn 30 coronary stenoses, intracoronary pressure measurements were performed in supine, left, and right lateral patient position. Height differences between the distal and proximal pressure sensor were measured by blinded observers. Measurement results of the position with the highest ("high") and lowest height difference ("low") were compared. In group "high", all measured indices were higher: mean difference of fractional flow reserve (FFR) 0.045 (SD 0.033, 95% CI 0.033-0.057, p < 0.0001), of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) 0.043 (SD 0.04, 95% CI 0.029-0.057, p < 0.0001), and of resting Pd/Pa 0.037 (SD 0.034, 95% CI 0.025-0.049, p < 0.0001). Addition of the physically expectable hydrostatic pressure to the distal coronary pressures of the control group abolished the differences: corrected ∆FFR - 0.006 (SD 0.027, 95% CI - 0.015 to 0.004, p = 0.26), corrected ∆Pd/Pa - 0.008 (SD 0.03, 95% CI - 0.019 to 0.003, p = 0.18). Adjustment for hydrostatic pressure of FFR values in a standard supine position increased all values in anterior vessels and decreased all values in posterior vessels. The mean changes of FFR due to adjustment were: LAD - 0.048 (SD 0.016), CX 0.02 (SD 0.009), RCA 0.02 (SD 0.021). Dichotomous severity classification changed in 12.9% of stenoses.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates a relevant influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo, caused by the height differences between distal and proximal pressure sensor.

Indexed as

Hydrostatic PressureCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexFFRFractional flow reserveiFRInstantaneous wave-free ratioPatient position

Identifiers

PMID29098379
OpenAlexW2766154587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.