Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098314›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Acute and repetitive fronto-cerebellar tDCS stimulation improves mood in non-depressed participants.

Simon Newstead, Hayley Young, David Benton, Gabriela Jiga-Boy, Maria L Andrade Sienz, R M Clement, Frédéric Boy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Emotion.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon NewsteadDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK. s.newstead.882183@swansea.ac.uk.
Hayley YoungDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
David BentonDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Gabriela Jiga-BoyDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Maria L Andrade SienzCollege of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
R M ClementSchool of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Frédéric BoyCHEMRI, Center for Health and Environmental Management Research and Innovation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK. f.a.boy@swansea.ac.uk.
Swansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation, which allows for selective inhibition or excitation of neural structures. It has demonstrated some efficacy in the treatment of mood disorders. However, these studies have predominately focused on stimulation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The cerebellum has an increasingly recognized role in emotional control, affective state, and some psychopathologies. As such, tDCS research into mood modulation needs to expand beyond conventional PFC-focused paradigms. Using a contralateral stimulation electrode placement [anodal left dorsolateral(dl)PFC, cathodal right cerebellum], and a single-blind, repeated-measures design, we initially assessed changes in the mood of healthy participants in response to acute stimulation (n = 44) and three repeated stimulations delivered second-daily (n = 21). In a second experiment, we separately investigated the influence of reversed polarity upon these same measures, in response to acute stimulation (n = 23) and repeated stimulation (n = 11). We observed a systematic elevation of mood in both active conditions following single and repeated tDCS, the latter of which displayed a progressive elevation of mood from baseline. No mood change was noted in response to either single or repeated stimulation in the sham condition. Frontocerebellar tDCS stimulation advantageously influences mood in healthy participants, with an accumulative and potentiated effect following successive stimulations. The possibility that frontocerebellar stimulation may provide a novel therapeutic adjunctive or pre-emptive intervention in stress-related disorders and mood-related psychopathologies should be considered.

Indexed as

AdultAffectCerebellumFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePrefrontal CortexSingle-Blind MethodTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung AdultCerebellumdlPFCHealthy participantsMoodtDCS

Identifiers

PMID29098314
OpenAlexW2766644903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.