ArticleJAMA oncology2018
Fiber Intake and Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 101 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dietary intake of total vegetable, fruit, cereal, soluble and insoluble fiber and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Plant-Based Diets and Cancer Prognosis: a Review of Recent Research.Current nutrition reports · 2022Pooled it
- Fermented Dairy Food Intake and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- The Facts about Food after Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Navy Beans Impact the Stool Metabolome and Metabolic Pathways for Colon Health in Cancer Survivors.Nutrients · 2018Trial
- Ultra-processed Foods and Gastrointestinal Cancer: Epidemiologic Evidence, Mechanistic Pathways, and Clinical Implications.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Review
- Knowledge, Perceived Barriers, and Whole-Grain Bread Consumption among University Students in Southwest Iran in the 2024-2025 Academic Year: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Dietary fiber intake and mortality among adults with hyperlipidemia : a retrospective cohort analysis from NHANES 1999-2018.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- The study on the identification of cross-boundary microbiome enterotypes between high-altitude and coastal populations and their predictive value.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- The Role of Plant-Based Diets for Cancer Survivors and Planetary Health.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Burden and projections of diet related early onset gastrointestinal cancers in young adults.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- The Microbiota-Diet-Immunity Axis in Cancer Care: From Prevention to Treatment Modulation and Survivorship.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Adherence to World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Guidelines and Mortality among Participants with Colorectal Cancer in the MEC.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Regular aspirin use, breast tumor characteristics and long-term breast cancer survival.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Dietary Manipulation on Gut Microbiome in Patients with Diabetes and Colorectal cancer.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Differential Effects of High-Fiber and Low-Fiber Diets on Antitumor Immunity and Colon Tumor Progression in a Murine Model.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Deciphering the impact of dietary habits and behavioral patterns on colorectal cancer.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- The power of microbes: the key role of gut microbiota in the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Dietary fiber consumption and outcomes of different cancers: an umbrella review.Food & nutrition research · 2025Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceAlthough high dietary fiber intake has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), it remains unknown whether fiber benefits CRC survivors.
objectiveTo assess the association of postdiagnostic fiber intake with mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA total of 1575 health care professionals with stage I to III CRC were evaluated in 2 prospective cohorts, Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality were determined after adjusting for other potential predictors for cancer survival. The study was conducted from December 23, 2016, to August 23, 2017. EXPOSURES: Consumption of total fiber and different sources of fiber and whole grains assessed by a validated food frequency questionnaire between 6 months and 4 years after CRC diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of CRC-specific and overall mortality after adjusting for other potential predictors for cancer survival.
resultsOf the 1575 participants, 963 (61.1%) were women; mean (SD) age was 68.6 (8.9) years. During a median of 8 years of follow-up, 773 deaths were documented, including 174 from CRC. High intake of total fiber after diagnosis was associated with lower mortality. The multivariable HR per each 5-g increment in intake per day was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .006) for CRC-specific mortality and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93; P < .001) for all-cause mortality. Patients who increased their fiber intake after diagnosis from levels before diagnosis had a lower mortality, and each 5-g/d increase in intake was associated with 18% lower CRC-specific mortality (95% CI, 7%-28%; P = .002) and 14% lower all-cause mortality (95% CI, 8%-19%; P < .001). According to the source of fiber, cereal fiber was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (HR per 5-g/d increment, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90; P = .007) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90; P < .001); vegetable fiber was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96; P = .009) but not CRC-specific mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.13; P = .22); no association was found for fruit fiber. Whole grain intake was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (HR per 20-g/d increment, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .002), and this beneficial association was attenuated after adjusting for fiber intake (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher fiber intake after the diagnosis of nonmetastatic CRC is associated with lower CRC-specific and overall mortality. Increasing fiber consumption after diagnosis may confer additional benefits to patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.