Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098286›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2017

Development of an 18-Item Measure of Symptom Burden in Patients With Glaucoma From the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study's Symptom and Health Problem Checklist.

David C Musch, Michelle E Tarver, Matt J Goren, Nancy K Janz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David C MuschDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Michelle E TarverCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Device Evaluation, Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
Matt J GorenCollege of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens
Nancy K JanzDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Administration of a brief questionnaire to evaluate glaucoma symptoms would lend useful information for patient care. Objectives: To develop a shortened glaucoma symptom measure based on the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) Symptom and Health Problem Checklist (SHPC) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design, Setting, and Participants: This measure development study evaluated the factor structure of the 43-item SHPC that was obtained from CIGTS participants at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. These 607 participants were enrolled at 14 clinical centers in the United States and had newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma. Their mean deviation (SD) from visual field testing was −5.5 (4.3) dB. Data were collected from October 1993 through April 1997. Main Outcomes and Measures: The factor structure of the SHPC, confirmatory factor analysis of the resulting 18-item questionnaire (SHPC-18), the reliability of the SHPC-18, and associations of the 2 symptom subscales (Local Eye and Visual Function) of the SHPC-18 with visual field severity and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25) subscales. Results: Among the 607 participants (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 57.5 [10.9] years), 334 (55.0%) were men and 273 (45.0%) were women; 231 (38.1%) were African American. Exploratory factor analysis and longitudinal growth modeling documented Local Eye and Visual Function symptom subscales. Cronbach α values for mean weighted internal consistency were 0.83 and 0.89 for the Local Eye and Visual Function subscales, respectively, and remained stable over time. Scores on each subscale significantly correlated with the NEI-VFQ25 total score (r = −0.41 and r = −0.59, respectively) and with all subscale scores (P < .01). Participants with more severe glaucoma had higher (worse) mean (SD) scores than those with mild glaucoma at baseline on the Local Eye (4.68 [6.62] vs 3.07 [5.60]) and Visual Function (8.44 [11.45] vs 4.42 [8.94]; P < .05) SHPC-18 subscales. Participants who underwent trabeculectomy reported a higher frequency of any Local Eye symptoms than those treated with topical medications (eg, at 12 months, 153 of 269 [56.9%] vs 11 of 276 [40.9%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that the SHPC-18 is a reliable, responsive, and psychometrically sound measure of patient-reported, glaucoma-related symptoms. The measure is responsive to treatment and discriminates the severity of glaucoma. This shorter version of the original SHPC measure may be useful in clinical and research settings to better understand the influence of glaucoma symptoms on patients’ daily life.

Indexed as

Sickness Impact ProfileAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsChecklistFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNational Eye Institute (U.S.)PsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID29098286
PMCPMC6331048
OpenAlexW2766226743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.