Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098168›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2017

Comparing search patterns in digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography: an eye tracking study.

Avi Aizenman, Trafton Drew, Krista A Ehinger, Dianne Georgian-Smith, Jeremy M Wolfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students' self-monitoring and learning in radiology.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Foveated Model Observers for Visual Search in 3D Medical Images.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Visual search in breast imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Avi AizenmanUniversity of California, Vision Science Department, Berkeley, California, United States.
Trafton DrewUniversity of Utah, Psychology Department, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Krista A EhingerYork University, Centre for Vision Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dianne Georgian-SmithBrigham and Women's Hospital, Surgery Department, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jeremy M WolfeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Surgery Department, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Prevalence effects in visual search: Theoretical and practical implicationsR01EY017001 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Jeremy M Wolfe · 2007 to 2026
$8.2M
Improving Perception in Digital Breast TomographyR01CA207490 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WOLFE, JEREMY M · 2016 to 2025
$4.6M
Searching 3D medical images: Using online feedback to increase accuracy and efficF32EB011959 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DREW, TRAFTON · 2010 to 2012
$100k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207490NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017001NIBIB NIH HHS F32 EB011959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a promising imaging modality, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) leads to better diagnostic performance than traditional full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) alone. DBT allows different planes of the breast to be visualized, reducing occlusion from overlapping tissue. Although DBT is gaining popularity, best practices for search strategies in this medium are unclear. Eye tracking allowed us to describe search patterns adopted by radiologists searching DBT and FFDM images. Eleven radiologists examined eight DBT and FFDM cases. Observers marked suspicious masses with mouse clicks. Eye position was recorded at 1000 Hz and was coregistered with slice/depth plane as the radiologist scrolled through the DBT images, allowing a 3-D representation of eye position. Hit rate for masses was higher for tomography cases than 2-D cases and DBT led to lower false positive rates. However, search duration was much longer for DBT cases than FFDM. DBT was associated with longer fixations but similar saccadic amplitude compared with FFDM. When comparing radiologists' eye movements to a previous study, which tracked eye movements as radiologists read chest CT, we found DBT viewers did not align with previously identified "driller" or "scanner" strategies, although their search strategy most closely aligns with a type of vigorous drilling strategy.

Indexed as

eye trackingmammographyperceptiontomography

Identifiers

PMID29098168
PMCPMC5658515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.