Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29098079›Full record

ArticleScience and technology of archaeological research2017

Preservation of the metaproteome: variability of protein preservation in ancient dental calculus.

Meaghan Mackie, Jessica Hendy, Abigail D Lowe, Alessandra Sperduti, Malin Holst, Matthew J Collins, Camilla F Speller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and technology of archaeological research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
37.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Multi-omic detection ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Meaghan MackieBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0763-7592
Jessica HendyBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-1058
Abigail D LoweBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-007X
Alessandra SperdutiServizio di Bioarcheologia, Museo delle Civiltà, Rome, Italy.
Malin HolstBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.
Matthew J CollinsBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-5501
Camilla F SpellerBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-9903
University of York · GBMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DEMuseo Egizio · ITNatural History Museum · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKYork Osteoarchaeology (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic analysis of dental calculus is emerging as a powerful tool for disease and dietary characterisation of archaeological populations. To better understand the variability in protein results from dental calculus, we analysed 21 samples from three Roman-period populations to compare: 1) the quantity of extracted protein; 2) the number of mass spectral queries; and 3) the number of peptide spectral matches and protein identifications. We found little correlation between the quantity of calculus analysed and total protein identifications, as well as no systematic trends between site location and protein preservation. We identified a wide range of individual variability, which may be associated with the mechanisms of calculus formation and/or post-depositional contamination, in addition to taphonomic factors. Our results suggest dental calculus is indeed a stable, long-term reservoir of proteins as previously reported, but further systematic studies are needed to identify mechanisms associated with protein entrapment and survival in dental calculus.

Indexed as

Archaeologydental calculusdestructive analysisLC-MS/MSprotein preservationshotgun proteomics

Identifiers

PMID29098079
PMCPMC5633013
OpenAlexW2742572040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.