Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29097924›Full record

SynthesisContrast media & molecular imaging2017

Meta-Analysis of the Correlation between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Standardized Uptake Value in Malignant Disease.

Shengming Deng, Zhifang Wu, Yiwei Wu, Wei Zhang, Jihui Li, Na Dai, Bin Zhang, Jianhua Yan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shengming DengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhifang WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yiwei WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jihui LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Na DaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5305-2494
Jianhua YanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7826-5509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis is to explore the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted MR and the standard uptake value (SUV) of

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphomaNeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID29097924
PMCPMC5612674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.