Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29097664›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

High-frequency recombination between members of an LTR retrotransposon family during transposition bursts.

Diego H Sanchez, Hervé Gaubert, Hajk-Georg Drost, Nicolae Radu Zabet, Jerzy Paszkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diego H SanchezThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1LR, UK.
Hervé GaubertThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1LR, UK.
Hajk-Georg DrostThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1LR, UK.
Nicolae Radu ZabetThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1LR, UK.
Jerzy PaszkowskiThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1LR, UK. jerzy.paszkowski@slcu.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrotransposons containing long terminal repeats (LTRs) form a substantial fraction of eukaryotic genomes. The timing of past transposition can be estimated by quantifying the accumulation of mutations in initially identical LTRs. This way, retrotransposons are divided into young, potentially mobile elements, and old that moved thousands or even millions of years ago. Both types are found within a single retrotransposon family and it is assumed that the old members will remain immobile and degenerate further. Here, we provide evidence in Arabidopsis that old members enter into replication/transposition cycles through high rates of intra-family recombination. The recombination occurs pairwise, resembling the formation of recombinant retroviruses. Thus, each transposition burst generates a novel progeny population of chromosomally integrated LTR retrotransposons consisting of pairwise recombination products produced in a process comparable the sexual exchange of genetic information. Our observations provide an explanation for the reported high rates of sequence diversification in retrotransposons.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticRetroelementsArabidopsisDNA, PlantEcotypeGenetic VariationGenome, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationSequence Analysis, DNATerminal Repeat SequencesDNA, PlantRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID29097664
PMCPMC5668417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.