Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29097397›Full record

ReviewGenetics2017

Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in

Dean M Castillo, Daniel A Barbash

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of mitonuclear incompatibilities in allopatric speciation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic Analyses ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dean M CastilloDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.
Daniel A BarbashDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 dab87@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Drosophila Hybrid LethalityR01GM074737 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2022
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question of how new species evolve has been examined at every level, from macroevolutionary patterns of diversification to molecular population genetic analyses of specific genomic regions between species pairs.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAnimalsDrosophilaGenetics, PopulationReproductive IsolationDrosophilaFlybookhybrid incompatibilitiesreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID29097397
PMCPMC5676244
OpenAlexW2765642473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.