ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Prediction of Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Genomic Data Using Recommender Systems.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel matrix multiplication framework for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction in genomic prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Multi-trait and multi-environment genomic prediction enhances yield components improvement in durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Stacked ensembles on basis of parentage information can predict hybrid performance with an accuracy comparable to marker-based GBLUP.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genetic dissection of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. resistance via genome-wide association and genomic prediction in tropical maize germplasm.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Article
- Integrating genomic-enabled prediction and high-throughput phenotyping in breeding for climate-resilient bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Prospects and Challenges of Applied Genomic Selection-A New Paradigm in Breeding for Grain Yield in Bread Wheat.The plant genome · 2018Article
- An R Package for Multitrait and Multienvironment Data with the Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Algorithm.The plant genome · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In genomic-enabled prediction, the task of improving the accuracy of the prediction of lines in environments is difficult because the available information is generally sparse and usually has low correlations between traits. In current genomic selection, although researchers have a large amount of information and appropriate statistical models to process it, there is still limited computing efficiency to do so. Although some statistical models are usually mathematically elegant, many of them are also computationally inefficient, and they are impractical for many traits, lines, environments, and years because they need to sample from huge normal multivariate distributions. For these reasons, this study explores two recommender systems: item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF) and the matrix factorization algorithm (MF) in the context of multiple traits and multiple environments. The IBCF and MF methods were compared with two conventional methods on simulated and real data. Results of the simulated and real data sets show that the IBCF technique was slightly better in terms of prediction accuracy than the two conventional methods and the MF method when the correlation was moderately high. The IBCF technique is very attractive because it produces good predictions when there is high correlation between items (environment-trait combinations) and its implementation is computationally feasible, which can be useful for plant breeders who deal with very large data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.