Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29097147›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2018

Infectious disease transmission: survey of contacts between hospital-based healthcare workers and working adults from the general population.

Lili Jiang, Isabel Hui Leng Ng, Yan'an Hou, Dunli Li, Linda Wei Lin Tan, Hanley Jian An Ho, Mark I-Cheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lili JiangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Isabel Hui Leng NgNursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yan'an HouInfectious Diseases - Epidemiology Unit, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Dunli LiDepartment of Infection Control, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Linda Wei Lin TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hanley Jian An HoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Mark I-Cheng ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: ephcicm@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) may be the inadvertent interface between the healthcare setting and the community for infectious diseases transmission.

aimTo investigate HCWs' contacts during a work day and compare these against working adults from the general population.

methodsProspective survey of contacts through 24 h self-reported diary in three public sector tertiary care hospitals and community-based working adults in Singapore. Participants were HCWs and working adults from the community.

findingsIn all, 211 HCWs and 1028 working adults reported a total of 4066 and 9206 contacts. HCWs reported more work-related contacts than community-based working adults (median of 13 versus 4), and more contacts that were neither household nor work-related (1 versus 0) but fewer household contacts (2 versus 3). HCWs reported more work-related contacts involving physical contacts, and more new contacts particularly with short duration (≤15 min) compared to community-based working adults. Among different HCW types, doctors reported the highest whereas ward-based nurses reported the lowest total work-related contacts. Around half of ward-based and clinic-based nurses' contacts involved physical touch. Work-related contacts reported by clinic-based nurses, doctors, and assorted HCWs were shorter than in ward-based nurses, with a substantial number effectively occurring with new contacts. Institutional effects significant on univariate analyses were much reduced and non-significant after adjusting for confounding by HCW type.

conclusionHCWs' contacts differ substantially from those of community-based working adults. HCWs may thus be at higher risk of acquiring and spreading contact-transmissible and respiratory infections due to the nature of their work. Whereas total number of contacts was fairly similar between HCW types, the characteristics of their contacts differed substantively.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousHealth PersonnelAdultCommunicable DiseasesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersYoung AdultCommunity-based adultsDoctorsHealthcare workersInfectious diseasesNursesTransmission

Identifiers

PMID29097147
PMCPMC7114670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.