Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096877›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Comparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgery].

Ana Carolina Carvalho, Fábio Jean Goulart Sebold, Patrícia Mello Garcia Calegari, Benhur Heleno de Oliveira, Fabiana Schuelter-Trevisol

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Carolina CarvalhoUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (Unisul), Curso de Medicina, Campus Tubarão, Tubarão, SC, Brasil.
Fábio Jean Goulart SeboldHospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (HNSC), Anestesiologia, Tubarão, SC, Brasil.
Patrícia Mello Garcia CalegariHospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (HNSC), Anestesiologia, Tubarão, SC, Brasil.
Benhur Heleno de OliveiraHospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (HNSC), Anestesiologia, Tubarão, SC, Brasil.
Fabiana Schuelter-TrevisolUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (Unisul), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Tubarão, SC, Brasil; Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (HNSC), Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas, Tubarão, SC, Brasil. Electronic address: fastrevisol@gmail.com.
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição · BRUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using the numerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

methodA randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg

resultsEach group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ±2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ±2.6 (p =0.029). The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p =0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ±178.5 minutes in the MeG, and 269.4 ±252.9 in the MoG (p =0.005).

conclusionsMethadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledCoronary Artery BypassAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedMorphinePain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneMorphineCardiac surgeryCirurgia cardíacaDor pós‐operatóriaMetadonaMethadoneMorfinaMorphinePostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID29096877
PMCPMC9391719
OpenAlexW2765869702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.