Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096710›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2017

Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.

Stephen Bornstein, Rochelle Baker, Pablo Navarro, Sarah Mackey, David Speed, Melissa Sullivan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen BornsteinNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada. sbornste@mun.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-4646
Rochelle BakerNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.
Pablo NavarroNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.
Sarah MackeyNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.
David SpeedNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.
Melissa SullivanNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.
Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research · CA

Funding

CIHR 374427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Contextualized Health Research Synthesis Program (CHRSP), developed in 2007 by the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, produces contextualized knowledge syntheses for health-system decision makers. The program provides timely, relevant, and easy-to-understand scientific evidence; optimizes evidence uptake; and, most importantly, attunes research questions and evidence to the specific context in which knowledge users must apply the findings.

methodsAs an integrated knowledge translation (KT) method, CHRSP: Involves intensive partnerships with senior healthcare decision makers who propose priority research topics and participate on research teams; Considers local context both in framing the research question and in reporting the findings; Makes economical use of resources by utilizing a limited number of staff; Uses a combination of external and local experts; and Works quickly by synthesizing high-level systematic review evidence rather than primary studies. Although it was developed in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador, the CHRSP methodology is adaptable to a variety of settings with distinctive features, such as those in rural, remote, and small-town locations.

resultsCHRSP has published 25 syntheses on priority topics chosen by the provincial healthcare system, including: Clinical and cost-effectiveness: telehealth, rural renal dialysis, point-of-care testing; Community-based health services: helping seniors age in place, supporting seniors with dementia, residential treatment centers for at-risk youth; Healthcare organization/service delivery: reducing acute-care length of stay, promoting flu vaccination among health workers, safe patient handling, age-friendly acute care; and Health promotion: diabetes prevention, promoting healthy dietary habits. These studies have been used by decision makers to inform local policy and practice decisions.

conclusionsBy asking the health system to identify its own priorities and to participate directly in the research process, CHRSP fully integrates KT among researchers and knowledge users in healthcare in Newfoundland and Labrador. This high level of decision-maker buy-in has resulted in a corresponding level of uptake. CHRSP studies have directly informed a number of policy and practice directions, including the design of youth residential treatment centers, a provincial policy on single-use medical devices, and most recently, the opening of the province's first Acute Care for the Elderly hospital unit.

Indexed as

Decision MakingOrganizationsReview Literature as TopicTranslational Research, BiomedicalCanadaEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PolicyHumans

Identifiers

PMID29096710
PMCPMC5667442
OpenAlexW2767076529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.