Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096634›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2017

Prediction of high airway pressure using a non-linear autoregressive model of pulmonary mechanics.

Ruby Langdon, Paul D Docherty, Christoph Schranz, J Geoffrey Chase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruby LangdonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Paul D DochertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. paul.docherty@canterbury.ac.nz.
Christoph SchranzHamilton Medical, Via Crusch 8, 7402, Bonaduz, Switzerland.
J Geoffrey ChaseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZHamilton Medical (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), suboptimal PEEP levels can cause ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). In particular, high PEEP and high peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) can cause over distension of alveoli that is associated with VILI. However, PEEP must also be sufficient to maintain recruitment in ARDS lungs. A lung model that accurately and precisely predicts the outcome of an increase in PEEP may allow dangerous high PIP to be avoided, and reduce the incidence of VILI. METHODS AND

resultsSixteen pressure-flow data sets were collected from nine mechanically ventilated ARDs patients that underwent one or more recruitment manoeuvres. A nonlinear autoregressive (NARX) model was identified on one or more adjacent PEEP steps, and extrapolated to predict PIP at 2, 4, and 6 cmH

conclusionsClinically, false negatives are more harmful than false positives, as a high PIP may result in distension and VILI. Thus, the NARX model may be more effective than the FOM in allowing clinicians to reduce the risk of applying a PEEP that results in dangerously high airway pressures.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNonlinear DynamicsPressureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLungMiddle AgedRespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeYoung AdultAutoregressive modelsBiomedical systemsPulmonary modelling

Identifiers

PMID29096634
PMCPMC5668972
OpenAlexW2765949395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.