Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096614›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

"Active Team" a social and gamified app-based physical activity intervention: randomised controlled trial study protocol.

Sarah Edney, Ronald Plotnikoff, Corneel Vandelanotte, Tim Olds, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Jillian Ryan, Carol Maher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of FacebookInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah EdneyAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ronald PlotnikoffPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Advance Technology Centre, Level 3, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Corneel VandelanottePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Tim OldsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Jillian RyanAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Carol MaherAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Carol.Maher@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity is a leading preventable cause of chronic disease and premature death globally, yet over half of the adult Australian population is inactive. To address this, web-based physical activity interventions, which have the potential to reach large numbers of users at low costs, have received considerable attention. To fully realise the potential of such interventions, there is a need to further increase their appeal to boost engagement and retention, and sustain intervention effects over longer periods of time. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a gamified physical activity intervention that connects users to each other via Facebook and is delivered via a mobile app.

methodsThe study is a three-group, cluster-RCT. Four hundred and forty (440) inactive Australian adults who use Facebook at least weekly will be recruited in clusters of three to eight existing Facebook friends. Participant clusters will be randomly allocated to one of three conditions: (1) waitlist control condition, (2) basic experimental condition (pedometer plus basic app with no social and gamification features), or (3) socially-enhanced experimental condition (pedometer plus app with social and gamification features). Participants will undertake assessments at baseline, three and nine months. The primary outcome is change in total daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at three months measured objectively using GENEActive accelerometers [Activeinsights Ltd., UK]. Secondary outcomes include self-reported physical activity, depression and anxiety, wellbeing, quality of life, social-cognitive theory constructs and app usage and engagement. DISCUSSION: The current study will incorporate novel social and gamification elements in order to examine whether the inclusion of these components increases the efficacy of app-based physical activity interventions. The findings will be used to guide the development and increase the effectiveness of future health behaviour interventions.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12617000113358 , date of registration 23 January, 2017).

Indexed as

ExerciseMobile ApplicationsSocial NetworkingVideo GamesAdultAustraliaClinical ProtocolsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram EvaluationBehaviour changeeHealthFacebookGamificationInterventionmHealthMobilePhysical activitySocial mediaSocial network

Identifiers

PMID29096614
PMCPMC5667488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.