ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2017
Off-resonance NOVEL.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-frequency dynamic nuclear polarization in rotating solids.Science advances · 2026Review
- In situ learning-based spin engineering of pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization.Science advances · 2026Article
- Effective Hamiltonian-Based DNP Sequence Optimization.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- High-field pulsed EPR spectroscopy under magic angle spinning.Science advances · 2024Article
- Characterization of dielectric properties and their impact on MAS-DNP NMR applications.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2024Article
- Pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization: a comprehensive Floquet description.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
- Polarizing agents for efficient high field DNP solid-state NMR spectroscopy under magic-angle spinning: from design principles to formulation strategies.Chemical science · 2023Review
- Electron-decoupled MAS DNP with N@CPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2023Article
- Non-perturbative treatment of the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023Article
- Observing Nearby Nuclei on Paramagnetic Trityls and MOFs via DNP and Electron Decoupling.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Article
- Designing broadband pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization sequences in static solids.Science advances · 2022Article
- Integrated, Stretched, and Adiabatic Solid Effects.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Observation of a four-spin solid effect.The Journal of chemical physics · 2022Article
- Reverse dynamic nuclear polarisation for indirect detection of nuclear spins close to unpaired electrons.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2022Article
- DNPSOUP: A simulation software package for dynamic nuclear polarization.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022Review
- Time domain DNP at 1.2 T.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2021Article
- Site-specific dynamic nuclear polarization in a Gd(III)-labeled protein.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Article
- High frequency dynamic nuclear polarization: New directions for the 21st century.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019Review
- Three-spin solid effect and the spin diffusion barrier in amorphous solids.Science advances · 2019Article
- Time-optimized pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization.Science advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is theoretically able to enhance the signal in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments by a factor γ
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.