Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096448›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2017

Internal force corrections with machine learning for quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations.

Jingheng Wu, Lin Shen, Weitao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive free energy simulations through hierarchical distillation of quantum Hamiltonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computer physics communications · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. FacilitatingPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. AffordableThe journal of physical chemistry. A · 2021
    Article
  13. Doubly Polarized QM/MM with Machine Learning Chaperone Polarizability.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingheng WuDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Lin ShenDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Weitao YangDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.ORCID 0000000155762828

Funding

COMPUTER SIMULATIONS OF ENZYMES AND DNAR01GM061870 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, WEITAO · 2000 to 2022
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ab initio quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) molecular dynamics simulation is a useful tool to calculate thermodynamic properties such as potential of mean force for chemical reactions but intensely time consuming. In this paper, we developed a new method using the internal force correction for low-level semiempirical QM/MM molecular dynamics samplings with a predefined reaction coordinate. As a correction term, the internal force was predicted with a machine learning scheme, which provides a sophisticated force field, and added to the atomic forces on the reaction coordinate related atoms at each integration step. We applied this method to two reactions in aqueous solution and reproduced potentials of mean force at the ab initio QM/MM level. The saving in computational cost is about 2 orders of magnitude. The present work reveals great potentials for machine learning in QM/MM simulations to study complex chemical processes.

Identifiers

PMID29096448
PMCPMC6910592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.