Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29096115›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2018

Model-based predictions for dopamine.

Angela J Langdon, Melissa J Sharpe, Geoffrey Schoenbaum, Yael Niv

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Chronic ethanol self-administration alters dopamine in the caudate nucleus and putamen of rhesus macaques in a sex-dependent manner.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mesocorticostriatal Reinforcement Learning of State Representation and Value with Implications for the Mechanisms of Schizophrenia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A brief history of dopamine prediction errors.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  10. Deliberating on the role of dopamine.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Striatal Gradient in Value-Decay Explains Regional Differences in Dopamine Patterns and Reinforcement Learning Computations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Modulation of Dopamine Neurons Alters Behavior and Event Encoding in the Nucleus Accumbens during Pavlovian Conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela J LangdonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States. Electronic address: alangdon@princeton.edu.
Melissa J SharpePrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States; National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States; School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Geoffrey SchoenbaumNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States.
Yael NivPrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.

Funding

Associative learning, decision-making, and addictionZIADA000587 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHOENBAUM, GEOFFREY · 2012 to 2025
$47.7M
Orbitofrontal cortex as a cognitive map of task statesR01DA042065 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI NIV, YAEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phasic dopamine responses are thought to encode a prediction-error signal consistent with model-free reinforcement learning theories. However, a number of recent findings highlight the influence of model-based computations on dopamine responses, and suggest that dopamine prediction errors reflect more dimensions of an expected outcome than scalar reward value. Here, we review a selection of these recent results and discuss the implications and complications of model-based predictions for computational theories of dopamine and learning.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAnimalsDopamineHumansLearningReinforcement, PsychologyDopamine

Identifiers

PMID29096115
PMCPMC6034703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.