ReviewNeuron2017
Molecular Neuroscience in the 21
Review in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biogenesis and reformation of synaptic vesicles.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Understanding the molecular diversity of synapses.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The coming decade of digital brain research: A vision for neuroscience at the intersection of technology and computing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- SAD-1 kinase controls presynaptic phase separation by relieving SYD-2/Liprin-α autoinhibition.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- S-SCAM is essential for synapse formation.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Bound CaFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Detection of endogenous NPY release determined by novel GRAB sensor in cultured cortical neurons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Performing Single-Cell Clonal Analysis in the Mouse Brain Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Multi-Omics for the Understanding of Brain Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Emerging roles of growth differentiation factor-15 in brain disorders (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Mitochondrial support and local translation of mitochondrial proteins in synaptic plasticity and function.Histology and histopathology · 2021Review
- Cell-Type-Specific Adaptions in Striatal Medium-Sized Spiny Neurons and Their Roles in Behavioral Responses to Drugs of Abuse.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021Review
- Neuroligin-3: A Circuit-Specific Synapse Organizer That Shapes Normal Function and Autism Spectrum Disorder-Associated Dysfunction.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Review
- The Interaction of TRAF6 With Neuroplastin Promotes Spinogenesis During Early Neuronal Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- Rethinking calcium profiles around single channels: the exponential and periodic calcium nanodomains.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Imaging and Manipulating Pituitary Function in the Awake Mouse.Endocrinology · 2019Article
- Activation and desensitization of ionotropic glutamate receptors by selectively triggering pre-existing motions.Neuroscience letters · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroscience is inherently interdisciplinary in its quest to explain the brain. Like all biological structures, the brain operates at multiple levels, from nano-scale molecules to meter-scale systems. Here, I argue that understanding the nano-scale organization of the brain is not only helpful for insight into its function, but is a requisite for such insight. I propose that one impediment to a better understanding of the brain is that most of its molecular processes are incompletely understood, and suggest a number of key questions that require our attention so that progress can be achieved in neuroscience beyond a description of the activity of neural circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.