Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095933›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Efficiency of two larval diets for mass-rearing of the mosquito Aedes aegypti.

J G Bond, A Ramírez-Osorio, C F Marina, I Fernández-Salas, P Liedo, A Dor, T Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Larval diet-mediated morphological trait andFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Life table variations inFrontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimization ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Temporal Viability ofInsects · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Riboflavin instability is a key factor underlying the requirement of a gut microbiota for mosquito development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J G BondCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
A Ramírez-OsorioCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
C F MarinaCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
I Fernández-SalasCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
P LiedoEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
A DorEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
T WilliamsInstituto de Ecología AC (INECOL), Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-3440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aedes aegypti is a major vector of arboviruses that may be controlled on an area-wide basis using the sterile insect technique (SIT). Larval diet is a major factor in mass-rearing for SIT programs. We compared dietary effects on immature development and adult fitness-related characteristics for an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) diet, developed for rearing Ae. albopictus, and a standardized laboratory rodent diet (LRD), under a 14:10 h (light:dark) photoperiod ("light" treatment) or continuous darkness during larval rearing. Larval development was generally fastest in the IAEA diet, likely reflecting the high protein and lipid content of this diet. The proportion of larvae that survived to pupation or to adult emergence did not differ significantly between diets or light treatments. Insects from the LRD-dark treatment produced the highest proportion of male pupae (93% at 24 h after the beginning of pupation) whereas adult sex ratio from the IAEA diet tended to be more male-biased than that of the LRD diet. Adult longevity did not differ significantly with larval diet or light conditions, irrespective of sex. In other aspects the LRD diet generally performed best. Adult males from the LRD diet were significantly larger than those from the IAEA diet, irrespective of light treatment. Females from the LRD diet had ~25% higher fecundity and ~8% higher egg fertility compared to those from the IAEA diet. Adult flight ability did not differ between larval diets, and males had a similar number of copulations with wild females, irrespective of larval diet. The LRD diet had lower protein and fat content but a higher carbohydrate and energetic content than the IAEA diet. We conclude that the LRD diet is a low-cost standardized diet that is likely to be suitable for mass-rearing of Ae. aegypti for area-wide SIT-based vector control.

Indexed as

DietAedesAnimalsFemaleFertilityFlight, AnimalLarvaMaleSex RatioSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID29095933
PMCPMC5667843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.