Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Association of high-risk sexual behaviour with diversity of the vaginal microbiota and abundance of Lactobacillus.

Jocelyn M Wessels, Julie Lajoie, Danielle Vitali, Kenneth Omollo, Joshua Kimani, Julius Oyugi, Juliana Cheruiyot, Makubo Kimani, John N Mungai, Maureen Akolo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Differences in the Genital Microbiota in Women Who Naturally ClearFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jocelyn M WesselsMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Julie LajoieDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Danielle VitaliMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth OmolloDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joshua KimaniDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Julius OyugiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Juliana CheruiyotKenyan AIDS Control Program, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Makubo KimaniKenyan AIDS Control Program, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
John N MungaiKenyan AIDS Control Program, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Maureen AkoloKenyan AIDS Control Program, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jennifer C StearnsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael G SuretteDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Keith R FowkeDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Charu KaushicMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7088-2569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the vaginal microbiota of women engaged in high-risk sexual behaviour (sex work) with women who are not engaged in high-risk sexual behaviour. Diverse vaginal microbiota, low in Lactobacillus species, like those in bacterial vaginosis (BV), are associated with increased prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition. Although high-risk sexual behaviour increases risk for STIs, the vaginal microbiota of sex workers is understudied.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted comparing vaginal microbiota of women who are not engaged in sex work (non-sex worker controls, NSW, N = 19) and women engaged in sex work (female sex workers, FSW, N = 48), using Illumina sequencing (16S rRNA, V3 region).

resultsBacterial richness and diversity were significantly less in controls, than FSW. Controls were more likely to have Lactobacillus as the most abundant genus (58% vs. 17%; P = 0.002) and composition of their vaginal microbiota differed from FSW (PERMANOVA, P = 0.001). Six microbiota clusters were detected, including a high diversity cluster with three sub-clusters, and 55% of women with low Nugent Scores fell within this cluster. High diversity was observed by 16S sequencing in FSW, regardless of Nugent Scores, suggesting that Nugent Score may not be capable of capturing the diversity present in the FSW vaginal microbiota.

conclusionsHigh-risk sexual behaviour is associated with diversity of the vaginal microbiota and lack of Lactobacillus. These factors could contribute to increased risk of STIs and HIV in women engaged in high-risk sexual behaviour.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSexual BehaviorFemaleHumansLactobacillusVagina

Identifiers

PMID29095928
PMCPMC5667760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.