Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Characterizing the rapid spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) through an animal food manufacturing facility.

Loni L Schumacher, Anne R Huss, Roger A Cochrane, Charles R Stark, Jason C Woodworth, Jianfa Bai, Elizabeth G Poulsen, Qi Chen, Rodger G Main, Jianqiang Zhang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Loni L SchumacherDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Anne R HussDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Roger A CochraneDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Charles R StarkDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jason C WoodworthDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jianfa BaiDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Elizabeth G PoulsenDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Qi ChenDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Rodger G MainDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Jianqiang ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Phillip C GaugerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Alejandro RamirezDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Rachel J DerscheidDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Drew M MagstadtDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Steve S DritzDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Cassandra K JonesDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-8879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New regulatory and consumer demands highlight the importance of animal feed as a part of our national food safety system. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is the first viral pathogen confirmed to be widely transmissible in animal food. Because the potential for viral contamination in animal food is not well characterized, the objectives of this study were to 1) observe the magnitude of virus contamination in an animal food manufacturing facility, and 2) investigate a proposed method, feed sequencing, to decrease virus decontamination on animal food-contact surfaces. A U.S. virulent PEDV isolate was used to inoculate 50 kg swine feed, which was mixed, conveyed, and discharged into bags using pilot-scale feed manufacturing equipment. Surfaces were swabbed and analyzed for the presence of PEDV RNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Environmental swabs indicated complete contamination of animal food-contact surfaces (0/40 vs. 48/48, positive baseline samples/total baseline samples, positive subsequent samples/total subsequent samples, respectively; P < 0.05) and near complete contamination of non-animal food-contact surfaces (0/24 vs. 16/18, positive baseline samples/total baseline samples, positive subsequent samples/total subsequent samples, respectively; P < 0.05). Flushing animal food-contact surfaces with low-risk feed is commonly used to reduce cross-contamination in animal feed manufacturing. Thus, four subsequent 50 kg batches of virus-free swine feed were manufactured using the same system to test its impact on decontaminating animal food-contact surfaces. Even after 4 subsequent sequences, animal food-contact surfaces retained viral RNA (28/33 positive samples/total samples), with conveying system being more contaminated than the mixer. A bioassay to test infectivity of dust from animal food-contact surfaces failed to produce infectivity. This study demonstrates the potential widespread viral contamination of surfaces in an animal food manufacturing facility and the difficulty of removing contamination using conventional feed sequencing, which underscores the importance for preventing viruses from entering and contaminating such facilities.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDisease OutbreaksFood IndustryAnimalsCoronavirus InfectionsPorcine epidemic diarrhea virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineSwine DiseasesUnited StatesVirulence

Identifiers

PMID29095859
PMCPMC5667810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.