Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095816›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

Concurrent temporal channels for auditory processing: Oscillatory neural entrainment reveals segregation of function at different scales.

Xiangbin Teng, Xing Tian, Jess Rowland, David Poeppel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Reducing Tinnitus via Inhibitory Influence of the Sensorimotor System on Auditory Cortical Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Segmenting and Predicting Musical Phrase Structure Exploits Neural Gain Modulation and Phase Precession.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Oscillatory Waveform Shape and Temporal Spike Correlations Differ across Bat Frontal and Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rhythmic Entrainment Echoes in Auditory Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dynamics of Functional Networks for Syllable and Word-Level Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiangbin TengMax-Planck-Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-4957
Xing TianNew York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Jess RowlandSchool of Visual Arts, New York, New York, United States of America.
David PoeppelMax-Planck-Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

Cortical Mechanisms in Speech Perception: MEG StudiesR01DC005660 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI POEPPEL, DAVID E · 2002 to 2018
$7.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural sounds convey perceptually relevant information over multiple timescales, and the necessary extraction of multi-timescale information requires the auditory system to work over distinct ranges. The simplest hypothesis suggests that temporal modulations are encoded in an equivalent manner within a reasonable intermediate range. We show that the human auditory system selectively and preferentially tracks acoustic dynamics concurrently at 2 timescales corresponding to the neurophysiological theta band (4-7 Hz) and gamma band ranges (31-45 Hz) but, contrary to expectation, not at the timescale corresponding to alpha (8-12 Hz), which has also been found to be related to auditory perception. Listeners heard synthetic acoustic stimuli with temporally modulated structures at 3 timescales (approximately 190-, approximately 100-, and approximately 30-ms modulation periods) and identified the stimuli while undergoing magnetoencephalography recording. There was strong intertrial phase coherence in the theta band for stimuli of all modulation rates and in the gamma band for stimuli with corresponding modulation rates. The alpha band did not respond in a similar manner. Classification analyses also revealed that oscillatory phase reliably tracked temporal dynamics but not equivalently across rates. Finally, mutual information analyses quantifying the relation between phase and cochlear-scaled correlations also showed preferential processing in 2 distinct regimes, with the alpha range again yielding different patterns. The results support the hypothesis that the human auditory system employs (at least) a 2-timescale processing mode, in which lower and higher perceptual sampling scales are segregated by an intermediate temporal regime in the alpha band that likely reflects different underlying computations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationNervous System Physiological PhenomenaAuditory PerceptionBehaviorBiomarkersElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMaleTheta RhythmTime FactorsYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29095816
PMCPMC5667736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.