Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095802›Full record

ArticleMorbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002)2017

Occupational Exposure to Vapor-Gas, Dust, and Fumes in a Cohort of Rural Adults in Iowa Compared with a Cohort of Urban Adults.

Brent C Doney, Paul K Henneberger, Michael J Humann, Xiaoming Liang, Kevin M Kelly, Jean M Cox-Ganser

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COPD and Rural Health: A Dialogue on the National Action Plan.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brent C DoneyRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Paul K HennebergerRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Michael J HumannRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Xiaoming LiangRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Kevin M KellyThe University of Iowa, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
Jean M Cox-GanserRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U50 OH007548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problem/conditionMany rural residents work in the field of agriculture; however, employment in nonagricultural jobs also is common. Because previous studies in rural communities often have focused on agricultural workers, much less is known about the occupational exposures in other types of jobs in rural settings. Characterizing airborne occupational exposures that can contribute to respiratory diseases is important so that differences between rural and urban working populations can be assessed. REPORTING PERIOD: 1994-2011. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: This investigation used data from the baseline questionnaire completed by adult rural residents participating in the Keokuk County Rural Health Study (KCRHS). The distribution of jobs and occupational exposures to vapor-gas, dust, and fumes (VGDF) among all participants was analyzed and stratified by farming status (current, former, and never) then compared with a cohort of urban workers from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occupational exposure in the last job was assessed with a job-exposure matrix (JEM) developed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The COPD JEM assesses VGDF exposure at levels of none or low, medium, and high.

resultsThe 1,699 KCRHS (rural) participants were more likely to have medium or high occupational VGDF exposure (43.2%) at their last job than their urban MESA counterparts (15.0% of 3,667 participants). One fifth (20.8%) of the rural participants currently farmed, 43.1% were former farmers, and approximately one third (36.1%) had never farmed. These three farming groups differed in VGDF exposure at the last job, with the prevalence of medium or high exposure at 80.2% for current farmers, 38.7% for former farmers, and 27.4% for never farmers, and all three percentages were higher than the 15.0% medium or high level of VGDF exposure for urban workers.

interpretationRural workers, including those who had never farmed, were more likely to experience occupational VGDF exposure than urban workers. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: The occupational exposures of rural adults assessed using the COPD JEM will be used to investigate their potential association with obstructive respiratory health problems (e.g., airflow limitation and chronic bronchitis). This assessment might highlight occupations in need of preventive interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAir Pollutants, OccupationalCohort StudiesDustFemaleGasesHumansIowaMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOccupationsAir Pollutants, OccupationalDustGases

Identifiers

PMID29095802
PMCPMC5829718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.