ArticleMedicine2017
Determination of the optimal target level of proteinuria in the management of patients with glomerular diseases by using different definitions of proteinuria.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The biosensor using the target urine volatile organic compounds for detecting diabetic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review on epidemiology, disease burden, and treatment patterns of IgA nephropathy in select APAC countries.BMC nephrology · 2024Review
- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Patient Baseline Characteristics in the Sparsentan Phase 3 DUPLEX Study.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Time-averaged proteinuria during follow-up and renal prognosis in patients with biopsy-proven benign nephrosclerosis.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2020Article
- Study Design of the Phase 3 Sparsentan Versus Irbesartan (DUPLEX) Study in Patients With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.Kidney international reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteinuria is a major determinant of adverse renal outcome, and its reduction slows renal progression in glomerular diseases. However, the optimal target of proteinuria in glomerular diseases is unclear, and discrepancies in the definition of proteinuria produce ambiguous findings. Here we investigated the optimal target of proteinuria by using different definitions of proteinuria. We analyzed 574 IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 175 membranous nephropathy (MGN), and 177 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) cases from 3 Korean kidney centers. We evaluated the impact of proteinuria on renal outcome with 2 definitions: time-average proteinuria (TAP) and time-varying proteinuria (TVP). The endpoint was renal progression, defined as a 50% decline in glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease. During a median follow-up of 57.3 months, the primary outcome occurred in 54 patients with IgAN, 26 with MGN, and 30 with FSGS. Multivariate Cox regression using TAP indicated that there was a linear association between proteinuria and risk of renal progression in IgAN. However, moderate proteinuria was not associated with an increased risk of renal progression in MGN and FSGS. In contrast, the analysis by TVP showed that the risk significantly increased in proportion to proteinuria during follow-up in all 3 diseases. Our findings suggest that TVP-based model can delineate association between proteinuria and risk of renal progression better than TAP-based model, considering that TVP reflects the dynamic change of proteinuria over time. Thus, proteinuria reduction to the lowest possible level is required to improve renal outcomes in patients with glomerular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.